Categories Courts

Nepra top brass served contempt notices over employee’s termination

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) top brass has been served contempt notices over disobedience to Islamabad district judge’s stay order as the people at the helm of affairs terminated services of one of the employees even the court has directed them to restrain from passing any adverse order against the remedy seeker.

An employee of the Nepra Maria Rafique has invoked jurisdiction of the district court, saying she is a graduate of Cornell Law School and has previously worked as energy sector lawyer in UAE and also in Pakistan as an advocate high court. She made Nepra Chairman Tauseef H Farooqi, Vice Chairman  Nepra Rafiq Ahmad Shaikh, Members Nepra including Maqsood Anwar Khan and Rehmatullah Baloch and Registrar Nepra Syed Safeer Hussain as respondents in her petition.

Advocate High Court Umer Gilani appeared on behalf of Maria Rafique before the court and submitted that during 2020, because of his client’s rare expertise and skill set, the Nepra hired her services as legal advisor on a two years contract, saying she has been informed that the authority has decided to terminate her services illegally.

He urged the court to grant a stay order till final adjudication of the matter with directives to the Nepra to keep restrained from terminating her services as she developed a legitimate expectation that she would be allowed to complete the contract period and would not be terminated without hearing.

After accepting the stay application a week ago, District Judge Islamabad Abida Sajjad granted stay order in the matter as the court passed an order (a copy of which is available with TLTP) saying, “Since the appellant has agitated violation of her fundamental right that no due process of law is observed, therefore, she has prima face case for grant [of] ad-interim injunction in her favor. Hence, appeal is admitted for regular hearing and the respondents are restrained to pass any adverse action against the appellant without observing any due process of law.”

As the court was pleased to grant a stay order restraining Nepra from terminating Maria Rafique without at least providing her reasons and an opportunity of hearing but the respondents failed to observed the court orders.

Gilani filed contempt of court application before District Judge Islamabad Abida Sajjad and submitted that the stay order was duly served upon the accused Nepra chair and his representatives. However, in contemptuous defiance of the said order, a termination notice was sent by email to the applicant at 10:30pm on the night of December 02 at the day when the stay order was granted in the matter.

Counsel for the applicant Umer Ijaz Gilani argued on Wednesday that because of the respondents’ defiance of court orders, his client’s fundamental right to hearing has been frustrated saying basic remedy which his client was seeking  a pre-termination opportunity of hearing has been stolen from her, as a result of which her entire litigation has become futile and infraction. “This has not only adversely affected the applicant but has also lowered the esteem of the honorable court in the eyes of the general public”, Gilani argued.

Representing the Nepra, Advocate Qaisar Imam appeared before the court, however, after hearing preliminary arguments of both the parties in the case the Court was pleased to issue pre-admission notices for contempt of court to chairman Nepra and members.

Later, hearing of the matter was adjourned till January 04, 2022.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…