Categories Courts

IHC asks Imran Khan to join police investigation in terrorism case

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday refused to exercise its inherent power to quash criminal case registered against former prime minister and Chairman Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf Imran Khan under terrorism charges saying the accused should join the police investigation otherwise the law will take its own course.

During last month, Islamabad Police has registered an First Information Report (FIR) under terrorism charges against Imran Khan over alleged spawning fear and panic among police authorities, Additional District & Session Judge East Islamabad Ms. Zeba Choudhary and public. A Magistrate of Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) administration, Ali Javed became complainant in the matter while making several assertions of Imran Khan speech as part of his complaint.

Imran Khan has filed an application before the IHC seeking quashment of the FIR in the matter. It is pertinent to mention that under section 561-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, High Court is competent to quash proceedings even at the stage when challan has not yet reached Court and is under scrutiny with the prosecution branch.

During the proceedings, division bench of the IHC comprising Chief Justice Athar Minallah and Ms Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz was apprised that Investigating Officer (IO) had not been granted access to Imran Khan, hindering the legal process despite having served the notice.

The Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed while addressing to Imran Khan’s counsel Salman Safdar that Police uniforms to be respected as they are symbols of the state, adding the accused person in the matter should cooperate with the Police.

Responding to the court observation, Advocate Salman Safdar submitted that three further offenses have been added to the FIR and alleged the case has been registered against Imran Khan with malafide intentions on behalf of the government.

However, the Chief Justice Minallah observed one must have faith in the system of the State saying rule of law implementation is subject to obedience of the law.  Preventing the police from submitting a challan against Imran Khan, the court directed police to submit an investigation report to the court. CJ Minallah also directed the IO to inform the court whether terrorism charges are applicable or not.

After the counsel Salman Safdar assured that Imran Khan will join the ongoing investigation the bench adjourned hearing of the matter till September 15.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…