Categories Courts

Pemra imposes ban to air drama serial Hadsa

After a storm of criticism and public outcry, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) has imposed ban on dissemination and rebroadcast of TV drama serial Hadsa.

The subject of the notice itself read, “Objectionable content/theme of drama serial Hadsa.” Barrister Khadija Siddiqi, Advocate High Court, lodged a complaint through Barrister Muhammad Ahmed Pansota, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan, calling for action under Section 27 of the PEMRA Ordinance 2002.

The drama’s plot, seemingly based on the sensitive incident – a fact that has been denied by actor Hadiqa Kiani and showrunner Wajahat Rauf – triggered a surge of public discontent. Numerous viewers expressed their concerns on PEMRA’s official Twitter handle, highlighting the potential for the drama to exacerbate the trauma of the victim.

Responding to the public’s concerns, PEMRA undertook an evaluation of the drama serial. The regulatory authority observed that the storyline of Hadsa was “highly inappropriate, disturbing and not depicting true picture of Pakistani society”. The notice also read, “Furthermore, the public is of the opinion that portrayal of such heinous act will not only trigger the trauma of that unfortunate victim but would also tarnish the country’s image globally and viewers abroad would perceive Pakistan as an unsafe place for women.”

As per the notice issued by the regulatory body, “Broadcast/re-broadcast of drama serial Hadsa is hereby prohibited immediately under Section 27 of PEMRA Ordinance 2002 as amended by PEMRA (Amendment) Act 2007. The matter is further being referred to the Council of Complaints for appropriate recommendations to the Authority for final decision.”

A translation of a statement issued in Urdu by PEMRA read, “The ban on Hadsa highlights the authorities’ commitment to maintaining the quality of content and ensuring it resonates with the cultural and ethical values of Pakistan. This action also serves as a reminder to broadcasters to uphold the standards of content creation and to respect public sentiments.”

Furthermore, “The decision of the Complaints Council will shed further light on the drama serial’s fate, considering the guidelines set forth by the PEMRA Act and the PEMRA Code of Conduct. This incident underscores the regulatory body’s role in monitoring and safeguarding the media landscape in Pakistan, upholding content standards.”

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…