Categories Courts

Suspending internet, phone service imperils country’s functioning : SHC

This is time for digital right activists who are trying to ensure civil liberties in contemporary era as in response to pleas challenging suspension of internet and cellular phone services on the election day on February 8 amid  ban on access to social media platform X, Sindh High Court  issued directives to Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and the federal ministry of interior to file comments in the matter.

Responding query of the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi who was heading a two-member bench as to why internet and cellular phone  services were suspended on the general election day in the country, the PTA counsel counsel disclosed saying the services were suspended on the request of the ministry of interior and other security agencies due to security concerns.

The counsel further submitted the PTA had however asked the cellular phone companies and internet providers to restore the service on February 09. The court observed that the public interest and the system of the country were badly affected due to frequent suspensions of internet and cellular phone services. It observed that the PTA and other government functionaries still did not file replies with regard to the suspension of the internet and cellular phone services on the election day.

It said the country could not be run by suspending the internet or cellular phone services and the situation of the country could not be made better without understanding the ground realities. The bench observed  civilized world would not accept if such a situation was created time and again, adding the federal government was asked to submit reasons for the suspension of internet service during the election day.

The bench observed saying internet service was still affected in the country and the service was being controlled with different tactics. The court observed that prima facie social media platforms were being managed and the names of people causing the disruption would not remain hidden for too long.

However, the PTA counsel submitted that the PTA had not directed any company to suspend or disrupt the cellular or internet service after February 09. Counsel for the petitioners Jibran Nasir made a point arguing the PTA was admitting that it did not shut down the social media site X and it should be ascertained under whose order the social media site was closed down as it was a matter of national security.

The counsel for the PTA said the internet and cellular service was shut down due to national security concerns and reports were filed by federal and provincial governments agencies. The court observed that the internet service can be shut down in specific areas due to a law and order situation, but the entire country could not be deprived of it. It further said social media site X was still shut down and what action had been taken by the PTA if any company was not acting on instructions of the authority.

The SHC had earlier directed the PTA to ensure that there be no further shutting down, disruption or slowing down of the internet service unless there were valid or cogent reasons which shall be intimated to the court on the next date of hearing if such a situation further continued. The court made it clear that if no valid reasons were provided for the continued suspension, disruption or slowing down of the internet service, adverse inference may be drawn against the authorities concerned. The court had also directed the PTA to restore social media site X “if there was no lawful justification or reasonable grounds to deny the internet access to X”.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…