Categories Courts

Competition Appellate Tribunal Slaps Rs 25 Million Penalty on Pakistan Poultry Association Over Price Cartelization

ISLAMABAD: Upholding the decision of the Competition Commission of Pakistan against the Pakistan Poultry Association for forming a cartel on poultry product prices, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) directed the Association to deposit a fine of Rs 25 million within 15 days.

Reducing the penalty from Rs. 50 million to Rs. 25 million, citing a judgment of the Supreme Court in a similar case, the CAT issued directives to the PPA to deposit the amount within 15 days of receipt of the order, stated in a press release.

It has been stated that deciding a long-outstanding cartel case involving the Pakistan Poultry Association (PPA), the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has upheld the order of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) and disposed of the appeal filed by the association.

In 2010, the Competition Commission of Pakistan fined the Pakistan Poultry Association and its members Rs. 50 million for forming a cartel and illegally colluding on poultry product prices, in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act. The action triggered prolonged legal proceedings over cartelization in the poultry sector.

During the hearing, counsel for the appellant told the tribunal that the association had no objection to the appeal being decided in line with the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in a similar case, in which the apex court had taken a lenient view and reduced the penalty.

Relying on the same reasoning, and with the consent of the appellant, the Appellate Tribunal reduced the total penalty to Rs. 25 million. The tribunal held that the facts of the present appeal were largely similar. It disposed of the case without examining the merits afresh.

Author

Amna Anwar, Lidia, LLB, IIUI, Islamabad, Advocate Amna Anwar, Editor

The writer is an LLB student and contributes to Law Today. Can be contacted at amnaanwar@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…