Categories Courts

Four AAC Leaders Remanded In Gilgit Over Alleged Anti-State Speeches; Bar Council And HRCP Condemn Arrests

GILGIT: In a development that has sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and civil society of Gilgit-Baltistan, police have apprehended four senior leaders of the GB Awami Action Committee (AAC) on charges of delivering alleged anti-state speeches during an Iftar party, triggering widespread condemnation from bar councils, human rights organisations, and political circles across the region.

According to reports emerging on Thursday, the four arrested individuals have been identified as AAC Chairman Advocate Ehsan Ali, Advocate Nafees, Meher Ali, and Engineer Mehboob Wali. All four were taken into custody on Wednesday, following which an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) judge, Rehmat Shah, granted their physical remand until March 18, setting the stage for what promises to be a highly contentious legal battle.

Advocate Ehsan Ali, the most prominent among those arrested, is a highly respected and senior member of the legal community in Gilgit-Baltistan. He has previously served as President of both the GB Supreme Appellate Court Bar Association and the GB High Court Bar Association, and currently member of the GB Bar Council – credentials that have made his arrest all the more alarming and controversial in the eyes of the legal community.

Prior to the arrests, a First Information Report (FIR) was registered under the Anti-Terrorism Act at the Jutial police station, naming the AAC chief and the other three leaders, along with a host of other individuals, for allegedly making anti-state speeches during an Iftar gathering and conspiring to organise a protest demonstration. The FIR, which names as many as 13 AAC leaders in total, accuses them of delivering anti-state speeches, inciting the public, and planning to arrange protests against the state.

The other individuals named in the FIR include Asghar Shah, Masoodur Rehman, Manzar Mayar, Taroo Abbas, Nusrat Hussain, Waheed Hassan, Sahib Khan, Fida Esar, and Engineer Nadeem. The broad sweep of the FIR, encompassing a large number of civil and political activists, has drawn sharp criticism from multiple quarters, with many viewing it as a deliberate attempt to suppress legitimate political activity and silence dissenting voices in the region.

The arrests have provoked an immediate and strong reaction from the legal community. The Gilgit-Baltistan Bar Council issued a strongly worded statement expressing serious concern over what it described as the illegal detention of Advocate Ehsan Ali by local police. The Bar Council stressed that the detention of a practising advocate without transparent legal justification raised grave questions about the rule of law and created deep anxiety and apprehension among the legal fraternity of Gilgit-Baltistan.

Calling for swift and transparent action, the Bar Council urged the concerned authorities and police officials to immediately clarify the circumstances surrounding the detention and ensure that the rights and dignity of the learned advocate were fully respected and protected. The Council further demanded the immediate and unconditional release of Advocate Ehsan Ali, warning that any action that undermined the independence and dignity of the legal profession could not and would not be tolerated under any circumstances.

“The Gilgit-Baltistan Bar Council stands firmly with its member and will continue to monitor the situation closely to safeguard the rights of advocates and uphold the rule of law,” the statement concluded, signalling the legal community’s resolve to pursue the matter to its logical end.

The GB High Court Bar Association also joined the chorus of condemnation, along with numerous lawyers’ bodies, political organisations, and civil society groups, all of whom expressed alarm at the use of the Anti-Terrorism Act against individuals engaged in what they characterised as entirely peaceful and constitutionally protected political activity.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) also weighed in strongly, expressing deep concern over the arrest of at least five AAC leaders in Gilgit. The HRCP noted that reports of continuing police raids to detain other leaders — carried out in the wake of a meeting in Gilgit and ahead of a planned public outreach visit to Skardu — raised serious and troubling questions about the extent to which peaceful political activity was being systematically restricted and suppressed in Gilgit-Baltistan.

The HRCP demanded that the authorities ensure due process in all proceedings related to the detained leaders and refrain from curbing citizens’ fundamental rights to organise, assemble, and engage in lawful public dialogue. “Peaceful political activity is a fundamental right. Yet, in Gilgit-Baltistan, the government is denying these rights, and the FIR registered against AAC leaders for organising peaceful protests is condemned,” the HRCP statement said.

As the matter is now before the Anti-Terrorism Court, all eyes will be on the judiciary to ensure that justice is served transparently, impartially, and without any undue influence -particularly given the sensitive political dimensions of the case and the stature of those implicated.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…

Khudayar Mohla,Depalpur court verdict, child rape murder case Pakistan, intellectually challenged girl murder, Muhammad Nadeem conviction, Additional Sessions Court Depalpur, Section 376 PPC rape sentence, Section 302 PPC murder conviction, DNA evidence Pakistan court, Punjab Forensic Science Agency PFSA, life imprisonment rapist murderer, Section 545 CrPC compensation, Anti-Rape Act 2021 Pakistan, sex offenders register Pakistan NADRA, child abduction murder Punjab, judicial compassion victim compensation, FIR 1634/2024 Depalpur, minor girl rape murder Pakistan, Sessions Judge Muhammad Amir Munir, consecutive sentences Pakistan court, child safety Punjab Pakistan

Depalpur Court Convicts Rapist-Murderer of Intellectually Challenged Girl, Orders Family Compensation

DEPALPUR: In a rare exercise of judicial compassion alongside conviction, the Sessions Court Depalpur directed…