Categories Courts

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court saying the increase violates constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights.

Through Advocate Azhar Siddique, the forum filed a civil miscellaneous application in a pending constitutional petition challenging the petroleum pricing mechanism, urging the court to suspend the latest increase in fuel prices. Advocate Siddique submitted that the federal government has raised petrol and diesel prices in an abrupt, excessive and non-transparent manner during the pendency of the main case, further burdening the public.

It highlights that petrol prices have surged to around Rs458 per litre and diesel beyond Rs520 per litre, terming the increase disproportionate and economically exploitative. The plea claims the hike violates multiple constitutional provisions, including Articles 3, 9, 14 and 25, by undermining citizens` right to dignity, livelihood and protection against exploitation.

It has also questioned the petroleum pricing mechanism, alleging lack of transparency in cost structure and excessive imposition of levies, particularly the Petroleum Development Levy, reportedly reaching up to Rs160 per litre. The plea has asked the court to suspend the recent price hike, declare the existing pricing mechanism unlawful, and restrain authorities from further increases without a transparent, legally justified formula linked to international benchmarks.

The application is likely to be fixed for hearing on Monday. Dawn reported that lawyers call price hike `unjustified` The Sindh Bar Council and Sindh High Court Bar Association on Friday strongly condemned the unprecedented increase in petroleum prices.

The SBA said that such unjustified surge has placed a heavy burden on the public as well as members of legal fraternity and will further increase the inflation and economic hardship. The council urged the federal government to immediately review and reduce the prices of petroleum products in the interest of people. The SHCBA in a statement said that such unprecedented and unjustified increase has caused an unbearable financial burden on the common man rendering basic necessities increasingly unaffordable.

It is highly concerning that despite smart lockdown measures implemented by the government aimed at reducing fuel consumption, such a significant hike in petroleum prices has been enforced, it added. It also maintained that this decision was not only contradictory but also reflected a lack of consideration for the already struggling public including the legal fraternity.  The SHCBA further urged the government to review and revise the petroleum prices in the greater public interest as prompt action in this regard is essential to provide relief to the masses and restore public confidence.

Author

Shirin Ebadi,Kiana Rahman, Ali, Oslo, Editor, Kurdish woman Mahsa Jina Amini, Human Rights Activist Narges Mohammadi, Nobel Prize Committee, Woman, Life, Freedom, Nobel Peace Prize Award 2023

Ashi Asif is an Advocate of the High Court and has been associated with TLTP News Wire Service as a correspondent since 2020. She has covered major international events, including the Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony in Norway in 2022, and continues her global journalistic engagement with coverage of the Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony 2025 in Oslo. She can be reached at ashi@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

Khudayar Mohla, Legal News, Law Today Pakistan, Supreme Court Pakistan, Zahir Jaffer, Noor Mukadam case, Noor Mukadam murder, Islamabad murder case 2021, Zahir Jaffer review petition, Supreme Court hearing April 8, death penalty Pakistan, Islamabad High Court verdict, Sessions Court conviction, high-profile murder case Pakistan, Jaffer Group heir case, US national accused Pakistan, rape and murder case Islamabad, judicial review petition Pakistan, criminal appeal Supreme Court, three member bench Supreme Court, Justice Hashim Kakar, Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, life imprisonment commuted sentence, capital punishment upheld Pakistan, acquittal co-accused staff, TherapyWorks employees case, unlawful confinement charge, abduction charge acquittal, Pakistan criminal justice system, landmark murder judgment Pakistan, Supreme Court verdict 2023, Islamabad legal news, Pakistani judiciary updates, Noor Mukadam justice case, murder trial Pakistan, death sentence upheld appeal, high profile criminal trial Islamabad, criminal law Pakistan cases, rape conviction Islamabad High Court, Supreme Court cause list Pakistan, legal proceedings Zahir Jaffer case

SC Constitutes Bench to Hear Zahir Jaffer’s Review Petition in Noor Mukadam Case on April 8

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Saturday fixed April 8 for hearing the review petition filed…