Categories Courts

FSC moved to nullify amendment for issuing CNICs to eunuchs under gender options

 A petition has been filed in the Federal Shariat Court (FSC) on Thursday, seeking directives to nullify an amendment related to issuing computerised national identity cards (CNICs) to eunuchs under three gender options.

Abdur Rehman Advocate High Court filed the plea making chairman Nadra and federal interior secretary as respondents in the matter. He submitted that National Database and Registration Authority (Application for National Identity Card) (Amendment) Regulation, 2017 is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam, as laid down in the Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH)

According to the challenged amendment cards of eunuchs shall be processed under any of three gender options – Male Eunuchs, Female Eunuchs and Unisex. “This is the choice of the applicant to select the gender. Moreover, cardholder may apply for modification of gender as per desire or appearance”.

The petitioner prayed the FSC  to accept the Shariat petition against the impugned amendment which is Rule 2(1) of the “National Database and Registration Authority (Application for National Identity Card) (Amendment) Regulation, 2017. He requested the court to declare the amendment null and void on the grounds that it is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam. “Since the day of its insertion, and consequently all the changes recorded in the aftermath of the amendment mentioned above may also be declared null and void ab-initio with the direction of their reversal”, the petitioner prayed.

The petitioner submitted, “it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that by accepting the instant Shariat Petition, the impugned amendment i.e. Rule 2(1) of the “National Database and Registration Authority (Application for National Identity Card) (Amendment) Regulation, 2017, may kindly be annulled, being repugnant to the injunctions of Islam, since the day of its insertion, and consequently all the changes recorded in the aftermath of the amendment mentioned above may also be declared null and void ab-initio with the direction of their reversal, in the interest of protection of Injunctions of Islam and for the protection of the society based upon thereof. Any other relief, which this honorable court deems fit and proper, may also be awarded”.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…