Categories Uncategorized

Govt urged to invoke global legal system to include IoK in UN list of NSGT

Khudayar Mohla –

Speakers on Friday underscored the need for availing remedy from international legal system in order to include Indian Occupied Kashmir in the UN list of Non-Self Governing Territories (NSGT).

During a consultative session on ‘Evolving Situation in Kashmir’, held here at Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Islamabad under the chair of Maj Gen. rtd Sardar Muhammad Anwar Khan, ex-president, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K), speakers said that Articles 370 and 35-A were the only legal bridges linking Indian constitution with Jammu and Kashmir, and their abrogation by India has effectively made the region independent on technical grounds.

They expressed the situation provides ample opportunity to accentuate Kashmir cause internationally, availing which efficaciously can help setting the region and its people free from their decades old plight.

They were of the opinion that there were hundreds of options available for Pakistan to conduct the statecraft between peace and war. International legal system must be focused in order to find innovative ways for building a case for Indian Occupied Kashmir.

Speakers who deliberated on the occasion include; Executive President IPS Khalid Rahman, Sr. Defence Analyst Brig (r) Said Nazir, Amb (r) Abrar Hussain, Amb (r) Tajammul Altaf, Hurriyat Leader Ghulam Muhammad Safi, Dr. Syed Muhammad Anwer, former deputy attorney general of Pakistan, Abdur Rehman Usmani, CEO Al Hijrah Trust Pakistan, and Muhammad Ali, a renowned defence Analyst.

They added that Pakistan should seek to include Indian occupied Kashmir in the UN list of Non-Self Governing Territories (NSGT) – which are the territories that are governed by another country, are rarely allowed representations in the governing country’s legislature, and their people are yet to attain the full measure of self-governance.

The speakers were unanimous that Modi’s extremist actions have severed the bridge tying Indian constitution with Kashmir and now under the aegis of law, even the presence of a single Indian soldier in the valley would be regarded as an illegal occupation.
Commenting on the legal aspects of the Kashmir issue, the speakers highlighted that multiple petitions have been filed against the Indian actions of August 05 even in the Indian courts. This however must be remembered that the Indian courts are a part of the same system that supports occupant forces, and therefore no positive expectations should be attached with any component of the Indian system.

All the experts expressed that resources could also be mobilized to achieve membership of Kashmir in Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. Highlighting the security dimensions of the Kashmir issue, the biggest challenge faced by India in occupied Kashmir, according to the speakers, was to control the ground situation, and the country was most likely to continue using its state machinery to the full extent for the purpose.

“Kashmiris on the other hand were doing a remarkable job braving more than half of the total of Indian military troops in their region, and in return, Pakistan needs to not only recognize the sacrifice of the people of Kashmir but should also seek to disperse the concentration of the Indian troops from Indian Occupied Kashmir, speakers maintained.

Pondering upon the question of war, the speakers stated that the logic suggests that India is not interested in initiating war outside Indian Occupied Kashmir, however it can try to create distractions here and there every now and then, making it essential for Pakistan to stay vigilant and prepared in a clear and visible manner for any kind of threat.

It was also stressed that any small success achieved by Pakistan over the Kashmir cause should only be seen as a small step and must not be blown out of proportion. The focus must remain on the freedom struggle of Kashmir, in the support of which Pakistan should openly announce the provision of every humanitarian and material help for Kashmiris purely on principle, humanitarian, moral and ethical grounds.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC ruling, judiciary criticism Pakistan, freedom of expression Pakistan, contempt of court, social media campaign against judiciary, defaming judges Pakistan, judicial independence, Justice Ali Zia Bajwa, PTA action social media, NCCIA arrests, cyber crime Pakistan, anti judiciary content, Pakistan judiciary news, Aalia Neelum LHC, Justice Abher Gul Khan, Maryam Nawaz Punjab, Punjab government controversy, property ordinance Punjab, Protection of Ownership of Immovable Property Ordinance, judicial review Pakistan, Pakistan Bar Council statement, Tahir Nasrullah Warraich, Judicial Commission of Pakistan, JCP meeting, rule of law Pakistan, public confidence in judiciary, law enforcement directives, freedom of speech limits Pakistan

LHC Draws Line Between Judicial Critique and Contempt; Orders Crackdown on Social Media Vilification

LAHORE: While affirming that the law shields robust criticism aimed at rectifying judicial errors, the…

Graj w zabawy na prawdziwe pieniądze w kasynie 22bet bez ograniczeń

W kasynie 22bet możemy doświadczyć niekończącej się rozrywki i możliwych wygranych dzięki bogatej ofercie gier…

Profitez de promotions et de avantages non-stop au casino Lizaro

Au Casino Lizaro, nous savons comment maintenir l’excitation au rendez-vous grâce à des offres et…