Categories Courts

IHC MIT expresses satifaction over Capital District Judiciary performance

While examining administration of justice process in subordinate courts of the Capital, Member Inspection Team of Islamabad High court Tahir Mehmood Khan expressed satisfaction over district judiciary performance.

During the inspection Member Inspection Team (MIT) Tahir Mehmood Khan visited more than 50 courts and checked attendance of the judicial officers. During the visit ninety percent of judicial officers were performing duties efficiently while conducting adjudications in various civil and criminal matters. As per record he found 10 percent presiding officers were on leave due to personal engagements and illness.

Islamabad High Court administration has appointed Tahir Mehmood Khan as MIT during this July, who was serving as District & Session Judge District Court (West), Islamabad.

It is pertinent to mention that the MIT of the IHC is mandated to evaluate, supervise and monitor the performance of district judiciary under the aegis of high courts in pursuance to Article 203 of the Constitution.

The MIT monitors weekly, fortnightly, monthly and quarterly institution, disposal and performance of subordinate judiciary besides taking measure the performance of judicial officers in specific and subordinate judiciary in general as well as para-legal staff, process server agencies etc.

The MIT is authorized to inspect the sub-ordinate courts at random and/or on the direction of the IHC Chief Justice/Inspection Judges. In addition to inspect the courts he also examines the notes of Jail inspections that District & Sessions Judges conducts in their respective Sessions Division & Civil District. After examining the notes the MIT used to forward the same to the IHC’s Chief Justice with appropriate proposals including taking of actions.

The MIT is competent to redress the grievances of the public relating to delays, obstacles and irregularities in the disposal of the cases by the subordinate courts as well as the grievances of the public arising due to illegalities, high-handedness, violation of rules and regulations by the concerned official functionaries with the approval of the Chief Justice.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

US Court Approves Stay Applications of ICC-Affiliated Law Professors who Challenge Trump Order

Granting stay order in response to plea of two law professors, Federal District Court for…

ATC Jails Senior PTI Leaders for 10 Years; Party Mulls Appeal, House Boycott

Anti-Terrorism Court Faisalabad on Thursday awarded sentence to a group of senior leaders from former…

Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi, Omar Ayub Khan, May 9 trials, procedural violations, Anti-Terrorism Courts, judicial inquiry, political persecution, prosecutorial misconduct, Supreme Court Peshawar Registry, unfair trials Pakistan, justice for all, rushed trials, human rights, legal transparency, judicial accountability, Pakistan opposition letter, CJP meeting opposition leader, May 9 suspects, media access trials, legal reform Pakistan, Supreme Court of Pakistan, due process violations, judicial independence, legal system Pakistan

CJP to Meet Omar Ayub Over Alleged Procedural Lacunas in May 9 Trials

Days after Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly, Omar Ayub Khan, wrote a…