Categories Courts

IHC seeks response from ICT administration over cut in roti price

While hearing plea challenging legality of Roti and Naan price reduction notification in Islamabad Capital Territory, single member bench of Islamabad High Court Wednesday issued notice to Deputy Commissioner and others in the matter for Thursday.

In response to an initiative by the Punjab government, the ICT administration has issued a notification setting the prices of Roti and Naan at Rs 16 and Rs 20 for a standard serv­ing size of 120 grams.

Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani has invoked jurisdiction of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on behalf of Sajjad Ali making Chief Commissioner and three others as respondents in the matter saying without observing due process of law price for Roti and Naan has been decreased. The petitioner has come with the claim that such decrease in prices has no compatibility with ratio of decrease in flour price in the market.

During proceeding of the petition, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri raised question as to why petitioner has assailed the notification because it seems in the benefit of general public. Responding to the query, Barrister Gilani submitted that no subsidy mechanism has been implemented in the matter in line with flour prices saying in the scenario more than 3000 tandoor establishments in the ICT are facing financial loss due to cut in reasonable profit.

Barrister Gilani further contended that without a legal authority District Magistrate has issued notification on April 15,2024 while exercising powers under Section 3 of the Price Control and Prevention of Profiteering and Hoarding Act, 1977. He pointed out Section 3 of the Act only authorized the Federal Government to issue such notification. Barrister Gilani urged the court to set aside the notification in the matter on the grounds that an incompetent authority has issued this notification.

He apprised the bench that on April 15,2024, Punjab government has issued a notification, whereby price of Roti of 100 Gram has been fixed @ Rs.16/-, making point the counsel submitted how in the ICT, Roti having weight of 120 Gram can be sold at the same price i.e. Rs.16/-, even the price has not been fixed in accordance with law, as well as in the law laid down in a case reported as “Meat Merchants Welfare Association, Karachi and another. v. Government of Sindh and 02 others.” (1983 CLC 464),

He pointed out another violation of law of the land saying that no opportunity of hearing or notice has been issued to the Naanbai /Tandoor Association. He said the petitioner being Naanbai is poor citizen, is suffering irreparable loss due to unjustified and illegal act of Deputy Commissioner, ICT, Islamabad, hence the impugned notification is liable to be set-aside.

After brief hearing of the matter, the bench said in its order, “ Points raised, need consideration. Notice to the respondents. Deputy Commissioner, ICT, Islamabad is directed to depute a senior law knowing officer, well conversant with facts of the case to appear, in person, alongwith record in order to assist the Court on the next date of hearing. Learned Additional Attorney General and Advocate General, ICT, Islamabad are also directed to depute law knowing officers, to appear, in person, to assist the Court.”.

Later, matter was adjourned for April 25.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…