Categories Op-Ed

Law Can’t Save You from a Society That Wants You Dead

A few days ago, in the sweltering silence of rural Balochistan, a woman was dragged before a jirga – a tribal court that has no legal standing but holds more power than any judge in the eyes of the people who obey it. Her crime? Daring to choose the man she wanted to marry.

The verdict? Death. She was shot point-blank. Not in the heat of passion. Not by a jilted lover. This was a sentence – calculated, endorsed, and executed with ritualistic authority. She died not for breaking a law, but for breaking character. For refusing to play the obedient, voiceless woman society expects her to be.

Meanwhile, in Islamabad, Parliament was having a very different conversation. A bill was passed to remove the death penalty for certain offences, one of which included stripping a woman in public. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar argued that death was not a proportionate punishment for such a crime. And you know what? He’s right. Stripping a woman, as vile and dehumanising as it is, is not an attack on life. It’s a grotesque assault on dignity but not the kind that calls for a hangman’s noose.

But here’s where the hypocrisy stinks.

If stripping a woman doesn’t deserve the death penalty because it doesn’t take her life, then what exactly does a woman have to do to justify getting killed? Because apparently, in Balochistan, choosing your own husband meets the criteria. And that’s the problem. This country can debate legal semantics in air-conditioned rooms, but out there in the real State – the State of jirgas and guns and “honour” – a woman’s life is still negotiable.

The Penal Code might be evolving, but the soul of this country? Still stuck in a ditch where women’s bodies are battlegrounds, and autonomy is a death sentence.

The Pakistani state is in its “rebrand era.” There’s a visible push to make the Pakistan Penal Code look more progressive, or “human rights-centric,” as the buzzwords go. And on paper, it makes sense. We want to comply with international human rights norms. We want to show the world we’re shedding our barbaric past and embracing a more civilised legal framework. But let’s not delude ourselves: you cannot human-rights-ify a legal code when the people it serves are still clapping for murder in the name of honour.

The truth is: the law does not exist in a vacuum. You can soften the language of statutes, but it doesn’t soften the fists that beat women in their homes, or the bullets that end their lives in dusty fields. A law is only as good as the society willing to enforce it. And we? We’re not ready.

Our cultural DNA is hardwired to view women’s autonomy as rebellion. A woman who strips another of her dignity is a criminal but a woman who dares to own her dignity is a threat. That’s the contradiction we refuse to confront. And until we do, every amendment to the Penal Code is just lipstick on a corpse. A distraction. A performance.

Let’s be brutally honest for once. Pakistan doesn’t have a justice problem – it has a people problem. Laws can’t save you from a neighbour who believes your daughter’s choices are his business. They can’t save you from a jirga that thinks bullets are a legitimate form of community discipline. And they certainly can’t save you from the silence of a society that thinks “she brought it on herself.”

You want to remove the death penalty for public stripping? Fine. But while you’re at it, maybe consider adding consequences for the people who actually strip women of their agency. Maybe prosecute a jirga or two for murder. Maybe ask why women’s lives are still at the mercy of uneducated men with outdated codes of honour and easy access to weapons.  Until then, spare us the speeches about justice. Because justice requires more than well-meaning legislation. It requires rage. It requires revolt. It requires a collective willingness to call out every rotten custom, every misogynistic whisper, every blood-soaked verdict disguised as ‘tradition’.  The Penal Code might be evolving, but the soul of this country? Still stuck in a ditch where women’s bodies are battlegrounds, and autonomy is a death sentence.

Balochistan, jirga, honour killing, women's rights, tribal justice, Pakistan Penal Code, autonomy, gender violence, death sentence, legal reform, Azam Nazeer Tarar, stripping law, misogyny, cultural norms, human rights, rural Pakistan, legal hypocrisy, patriarchal violence, justice system, societal mindset, women's dignity, honour culture, legal discourse, feminist critique, tradition and law, anti-women practice
By Wajeeha Javed

—-

Courtesy – Dunya News

Author

Avatar photo

Making law simple, clear, and useful for everyone.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

University policy, PhD allowance, QS ranking, faculty bias, academic fairness, Pakistan universities, higher education inequality, teacher value, research excellence, academic vision, local PhD graduates, education policy critique, unfair increment system, faculty division, devaluing local academia, foreign vs local PhD, teaching quality, university inferiority complex, academic recognition, Rabia Chisti

When Universities Create Bias Among PhD Holders

By Rabia Mustafa It is quite disappointing to see how a university, which should ideally…

Saif Ur Rehman, Federal Judicial Academy (FJA), internship program, Quaid-i-Azam University, student experience, legal profession, district judiciary, criminal administration of justice, judicial wellbeing, National Symposium on Judicial Wellbeing, District Court Complex Haripur, Central Prison Haripur, mock trial, legal education, procedural law, diversity, inclusivity, Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS), LLB students, legal career

Law Student Saif Ur Rehman Reflects on Transformative Experience from the Legal Internship Program of the Federal Judicial Academy

This summer did not unfold as I had initially planned. I had something else lined…

extra-judicial killings, police encounters Pakistan, Crime Control Department Punjab, CCD Pakistan, drone surveillance police, human rights violations Pakistan, fake police encounters, Pakistan criminal justice system, due process of law, Article 9 Constitution Pakistan, police brutality Punjab, Supreme Court on extra-judicial killings, Benazir Bhutto PLD 1998 SC 388, fair trial rights, human rights watchdogs Pakistan, Pakistan law and order, constitutional violations, illegal police killings, Amnesty International Pakistan, Human Rights Watch Pakistan, ICCPR Pakistan obligations, rule of law Pakistan, judicial oversight, unlawful police actions, accountability in law enforcement, public safety and legality, sanctity of human life, legal reforms Pakistan, crime-free Punjab, state-sponsored violence, legal justice vs. revenge

Extra-Judicial Killings: A Threat to Rule of Law

It’s been a couple of weeks that we have been witnessing news pertaining to eliminate…