Categories Op-Ed

Nepotism and Favouritism in Public Sector

By

Nepotism and favoritism have significant issues within Pakistan’s public sector, impacting everything from recruitment and promotions to the distribution of resources and the execution of policies. These practices undermine the principles of meritocracy. In Pakistan, the intertwining of political and bureaucratic spheres has often exacerbated these problems.

Political leaders frequently leverage their positions to secure advantageous roles for family members, friends, or loyalists. This form of nepotism not only affects the hiring processes but also influences promotions and departmental assignments. Such favoritism undermines the efficiency of public services, as positions may be filled based on personal connections rather than competence and qualifications.

For instance, in various government departments, key positions have been occupied by individuals who are well-connected rather than well-qualified. This often results in poor decision-making and administrative inefficiencies, as the appointed individuals may lack the necessary expertise or commitment to their roles.

Nepotism and favoritism can perpetuate a cycle of corruption and inefficiency that affects the entire public sector as key roles are given to individuals based on connections rather than merit. Efforts to address these issues have been inconsistent.

While there are regulations and procedures in place intended to ensure fairness and transparency, their implementation is often weak. Anti-corruption bodies and oversight mechanisms may lack the authority or the will to enforce reforms effectively.

Ultimately, addressing nepotism and favoritism is essential not only for improving the functioning of the public sector but also for rebuilding trust between the government and its citizens. Only through sustained efforts and systemic change can Pakistan hope to overcome these entrenched challenges and move towards a more just and effective public administration.

Breaking the grip of nepotism and favoritism in Pakistan’s public sector is not merely a bureaucratic necessity it is a moral imperative tied to the nation’s democratic promise. These practices have not only compromised the effectiveness of governance but have also dimmed the hopes of a generation striving for fairness and opportunity.
True reform begins when merit is not the exception but the rule, and when public office is seen not as a privilege to be inherited, but a responsibility to be earned. Until then, Pakistan’s progress longer will remain hostage to connections rather than competence and the future will be written not by the most capable, but by the best connected

—-

Courtesy – Dunya News

Author

Avatar photo

Making law simple, clear, and useful for everyone.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

University policy, PhD allowance, QS ranking, faculty bias, academic fairness, Pakistan universities, higher education inequality, teacher value, research excellence, academic vision, local PhD graduates, education policy critique, unfair increment system, faculty division, devaluing local academia, foreign vs local PhD, teaching quality, university inferiority complex, academic recognition, Rabia Chisti

When Universities Create Bias Among PhD Holders

By Rabia Mustafa It is quite disappointing to see how a university, which should ideally…

Saif Ur Rehman, Federal Judicial Academy (FJA), internship program, Quaid-i-Azam University, student experience, legal profession, district judiciary, criminal administration of justice, judicial wellbeing, National Symposium on Judicial Wellbeing, District Court Complex Haripur, Central Prison Haripur, mock trial, legal education, procedural law, diversity, inclusivity, Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS), LLB students, legal career

Law Student Saif Ur Rehman Reflects on Transformative Experience from the Legal Internship Program of the Federal Judicial Academy

This summer did not unfold as I had initially planned. I had something else lined…

extra-judicial killings, police encounters Pakistan, Crime Control Department Punjab, CCD Pakistan, drone surveillance police, human rights violations Pakistan, fake police encounters, Pakistan criminal justice system, due process of law, Article 9 Constitution Pakistan, police brutality Punjab, Supreme Court on extra-judicial killings, Benazir Bhutto PLD 1998 SC 388, fair trial rights, human rights watchdogs Pakistan, Pakistan law and order, constitutional violations, illegal police killings, Amnesty International Pakistan, Human Rights Watch Pakistan, ICCPR Pakistan obligations, rule of law Pakistan, judicial oversight, unlawful police actions, accountability in law enforcement, public safety and legality, sanctity of human life, legal reforms Pakistan, crime-free Punjab, state-sponsored violence, legal justice vs. revenge

Extra-Judicial Killings: A Threat to Rule of Law

It’s been a couple of weeks that we have been witnessing news pertaining to eliminate…