Categories Courts

SC makes JCP proceeding audio public

Unprecedently, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial Friday decided to make public the audio recording of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) meeting — held on Thursday— after two senior judges and JCP members rejected a statement issued by the Supreme Court about the proceedings and outcome of the meeting.

Justice Qai Faez Isa rejected the statement soon after it was issued on Thursday while Justice Sardar Tariq Masood reacted to it on Friday. The SC statement had claimed that the JCP meeting for the elevation of five high court judges to the top court was deferred on Thursday while Justice Isa and Justice Masood maintained that the meeting had rejected the names proposed by the CJP Bandial.

The JCP met on Thursday, July 28 to consider the elevation of five high court judges to the SC but the meeting ended without any approval and reports claimed that at least five of the nine members of the JCP had “rejected” the names proposed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial.

A private television reported that the SC officials promptly acted to counter such claims. A statement titled “Press Note” and undersigned by the “public relations officer” of the Supreme Court maintained that the JCP meeting was deferred to allow the chief justice “to place additional information and data about those already proposed and if he considers appropriate. But Justice Faez Isa, the puisne judge and a member of the JCP, rejected the SC statement and the notion that the meeting was deferred, making it clear that the JCP had “rejected” the names proposed by the CJP.

Statement by Justice Masood

On Friday, Justice Tariq Masood, another member of the JCP, said that the statement issued by the SC spokesperson was contrary to the facts. He said that the SC spokesperson was neither a member of the Judicial Commission nor its secretary.

Justice Masood said that the SC statement claimed that the meeting was deferred but in fact, the meeting rejected all five names by a 4-5 vote. The judge called for making the minutes of the JCP meeting public to put the speculations at rest.

CJP Bandial releases audio recording

Shortly after the reaction from Justice Masood, public relations officer of the SC issued a press release stating the CJP had ordered releasing the audio recording of the meeting on Supreme Court of Pakistan website.

Issuing a press release in this regard, the public relations officer of the SC Shahid Hussain Kamboyo said, “The version issued by the Public Relations Officer of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (“SCP”) under the instructions of Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan/Chairman, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (“JCP”) has been disputed by two Hon’ble Judges of the SCP, namely, Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood”.

Kamboyo added that a resulting controversy has therefore arisen in the print and electronic media. “In these exceptional circumstances the Hon’ble Chairman JCP has been pleased to relax the restriction under Rule 5(4) of the JCP Rules, 2010 and has directed for the audio recording of the JCP proceedings of 28.07.2022 to be made available on the official website of the SCP”.

He pointed out that the audio recording from time slot 1:29:45 to 1:38:08 contains the statement by the worthy Attorney General for Pakistan that the matters under discussion should be deferred to frame the appropriate rules. He did not assess or reject the merits of any of the High Court Judges proposed for appointment to the SCP. As a result, 5 members of the JCP supported the deferment of the meeting as reported in the Press Note of 28.07.2022.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…