Categories Courts

SC abolishes lifetime disqualification of lawmakers

Announcing its reserved verdict on Monday the top court declared lifetime disqualification for lawmakers under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution null and void paving the way for Nawaz Sharif to run for the prime minister’s office for a fourth time.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa led the bench of seven members comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarrat Hilali which resumed hearing identical pleas urging the court to determine disqualification period of lawmakers.

Arab News reported saying Sharif‘s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party is considered a frontrunner to win national elections, scheduled for February 8, with his arch-rival and former premier, Imran Khan, behind bars and barred from contesting elections for five years.

A seven-member bench of the apex court, led by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, announced the verdict on Monday, overruling a previous 2018 decision that imposed lifetime bans on politicians convicted under certain provisions of the constitution.  “The interpretation of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution in imposing a lifetime disqualification upon a person through an implied declaration of a court of civil jurisdiction while adjudicating upon some civil rights and obligations of the parties is beyond the scope of the said Article and amounts to reading into the Constitution,” the top court ruled in its written order.

“Such reading into the Constitution is also against the principle of harmonious interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution as it abridges the Fundamental Right of citizens to contest elections and vote for a candidate of their choice enshrined in Article 17 of the Constitution, in the absence of reasonable restrictions imposed by law.”

Article 62(1)(f) states that a person shall not be qualified to be elected or chosen as a member of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) unless “he is sagacious, righteous, non-profligate, honest and ameen, there being no declaration to the contrary by a court of law.”

In April 2018, the Supreme Court had ruled that lawmakers disqualified under Article 62(1)(f) would be unable to contest elections for the rest of their lives. However, in June last year, the government passed the Elections (Amendment) Act, 2023 that limited the disqualification of a lawmaker to five years.

In its verdict on Monday, the top court also observed that the Elections (Amendment) Act, 2023 prescribed a period of five years for disqualification of lawmakers. “Section 232(2) added in the Elections Act, 2017, vide the Elections (Amendment) Act, 2023 promulgated on 26 June 2023, prescribes a period of five years for the disqualification incurred by any judgment, order or decree of any court in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution and has also made such declaration subject to the due process of law,” the verdict read.

“This provision is already in field, and there remains no need to examine its validity and scope in the present case.”  Sharif was found guilty of corrupt practices in 2017. While the latest case was filed by other disqualified politicians, the ruling enables the three-time former prime minister to contest the polls as more than five years have elapsed since his conviction.

On the other hand, Sharif’s arch-rival, Khan, would not be able to benefit from the ruling as it only scrapped lifetime bans, which means the cricketer-turned-politician remains disqualified until 2028. In a post on X, Sharif’s party described the court verdict as a “victory” of truth. “This isn’t just Nawaz Sharif’s victory,” the PML-N said. “This is a victory for truth and for Pakistan’s future!!”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Imran Khan defamation case, Rs10 billion defamation suit, Shehbaz Sharif defamation case, Supreme Court Pakistan, SC bench defamation, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, PTI founder defamation, Lahore High Court order, Punjab government impleaded, Defamation Ordinance 2002, review petition Supreme Court, right of defence closed, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Panama Papers bribe allegation, defamation cases six months, SC defamation appeals, trial court Lahore, Justice Ayesha Malik bench, defamation proceedings stayed, PTI legal battle

Defamation Cases Must Be Decided Within Six Months, Says SC Judge

ISLAMABAD: While hearing set of appeals relating to defamation matter on Tuesday top court Justice…

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, judicial reforms Pakistan, Supreme Court reform session, Reform Action Plan RAP, death penalty cases reduction, case pendency Supreme Court, court digitization Pakistan, e-courts Pakistan, Federal Ombudsman Naveed Kamran Baloch, Law and Justice Commission Pakistan, Federal Judicial Academy, alternative dispute resolution Pakistan, case management Supreme Court, KPIs judiciary Pakistan, e-payment court fees, Public Facilitation Centre Supreme Court, barcoding file tracking, death sentence appeals Pakistan, SC case disposal rate, transparency justice system Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

All Remaining Death Sentence Appeals to Be Fixed for Hearing Within 30 Days: SC

ISLAMABAD : Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Yahya Afridi on Tuesday chaired the tenth interactive…

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…