Categories Uncategorized

SC upholds PHC order against NBP in special pay scale case

While taking cognizance of nepotism in recruiting management trainee officers (MTOs) at the state-owned National Bank of Pakistan, the top court on Friday asked the bank’s president to take strict action against people at the helm of affair without favor and fear.

National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) has challenged the Peshawar High Court (PHC) verdict that had directed the top brass of the bank to pay equal perks and benefits to MTO and non-MTO employees across the board.

Resuming the hearing in the matter, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court (SC) comprising Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Ijazul Ahsan asked the bank’s counsel as to why MTOs were being paid special pay scale which was greater in amount to the salary of old employees known as non-MTOs.

Expressing dismay over the situation, Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmad addressing the NBP counsel observed, “Viability of the NBP is in question – you (bank) are recklessly working as its officers deem assets of the bank to be their personal property”. The Chief Justice asked the Bank to treat MTOs and non-MTOs employees equally.

The counsel for the bank submitted that across the board payment of special pay scale will create a burden of Rs16 billion to the bank to which Justice Ijazul Ahsan plainly remarked, “The Board of Directors of the Bank should have thought about financial burden before making discrimination in recruiting MTOs on special pay scale”.

Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmad observed, “ Equal pay – equal work,” whereas Justice Ijazul Ahsan said while addressing the bank’s counsel over non-implementation of the PHC order in the matter, “ Can you think of disobeying the order of this court. Look at the way you are dealing with public money”.

The bank counsel sought more time to settle the issue but the Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed issued directives to the bank president to take action against the responsible officers who recruited their blue-eyed MTOs, dismissing the bank’s appeal and upheld the PHC verdict in the matter.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC ruling, judiciary criticism Pakistan, freedom of expression Pakistan, contempt of court, social media campaign against judiciary, defaming judges Pakistan, judicial independence, Justice Ali Zia Bajwa, PTA action social media, NCCIA arrests, cyber crime Pakistan, anti judiciary content, Pakistan judiciary news, Aalia Neelum LHC, Justice Abher Gul Khan, Maryam Nawaz Punjab, Punjab government controversy, property ordinance Punjab, Protection of Ownership of Immovable Property Ordinance, judicial review Pakistan, Pakistan Bar Council statement, Tahir Nasrullah Warraich, Judicial Commission of Pakistan, JCP meeting, rule of law Pakistan, public confidence in judiciary, law enforcement directives, freedom of speech limits Pakistan

LHC Draws Line Between Judicial Critique and Contempt; Orders Crackdown on Social Media Vilification

LAHORE: While affirming that the law shields robust criticism aimed at rectifying judicial errors, the…

Graj w zabawy na prawdziwe pieniądze w kasynie 22bet bez ograniczeń

W kasynie 22bet możemy doświadczyć niekończącej się rozrywki i możliwych wygranych dzięki bogatej ofercie gier…

Profitez de promotions et de avantages non-stop au casino Lizaro

Au Casino Lizaro, nous savons comment maintenir l’excitation au rendez-vous grâce à des offres et…