Categories Courts

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench after its nearly Rs. 88 million solar energy system was unilaterally shut down at its factory, by the very company that installed it  – despite the mill having paid in excess of the agreed installment schedule prompting Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan to dismiss the appeal on procedural grounds while directing the trial court to decide the matter swiftly within 15 days.

The factual position reveals in the matter that M/s SS Paper & Board Mills (Private) Limited had entered into two agreements in November 15, 2024 and February 26, 2025 – with Swift Solar Energy Private Limited for installation and operation of a 600 KW and 400 KW On-Grid Solar System at its Rahim Yar Khan factory against a total consideration of Rs. 87,868,000.

The respondents completed installation whereas appellant made regular payments, reportedly exceeding the settled schedule, while also leaving its security cheques in the respondents’ possession.  Despite this, the respondents abruptly suspended the operation of the solar system without any apparent justification, throwing the appellant into a deepening financial crisis. With no power being generated and daily losses mounting to Rs. 250,000, the appellant rushed to the Civil Judge 1st Class, Rahim Yar Khan, filing a suit for specific performance of the agreements alongside an urgent stay application seeking restoration of the solar system’s operation and restraint against its dismantling or removal.

In February 24,2025 the trial court granted only partial ad interim relief – restraining the respondents from dismantling or removing the installed system – but stopped short of directing restoration of its operation. Unsatisfied with this limited relief and facing a ticking financial clock, the appellant challenged the trial court’s order before the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench through a First Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Before the High Court, counsel for the appellant Sardar Abdul Basit Khan argued saying the balance of convenience clearly tilted in his client’s favour. He contended that the appellant had not only honored all payment obligations but had paid amounts in excess of the agreed schedule, and that the respondents’ unilateral action of suspending the system was causing irreparable financial harm with every passing day.

The High Court, however, was not persuaded on the question of maintainability. Relying upon the precedent in Shariq Builders and Property Advisors v. Dr. Muhammad Faisal Murad and others (2024 MLD 32), Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan held that a clear distinction exists between an ad interim injunction – which is merely a stopgap arrangement – and a temporary injunction, which is a considered order passed after formally hearing the parties. Since the stay application was still pending before the trial court and had not been finally decided, no First Appeal lay against the limited ad interim order at this premature stage. The appeal was accordingly declared not maintainable.

While upholding procedural law firmly, the Court did not remain blind to the appellant’s genuine distress. In a moment of rare judicial empathy, Justice Awan acknowledged the urgency of the situation through a vivid proverb:

“Till the antidote reaches, the snake-bitten may die.”

Rather than leaving the appellant without a remedy, the Court converted its order into a practical lifeline – directing the Civil Judge 1st Class, Rahim Yar Khan to decide the stay application preferably within 15 days of receiving the certified copy of the order, after affording both parties adequate opportunity of hearing and applying strictly the principle of balance of convenience and inconvenience as elaborated in Muhammad Rasab and another v. Muhammad Siddiquie Chaudhry (1998 MLD 2045).

A five-page verdict,  approved for reporting, serves as a timely reminder that while appellate courts cannot be approached prematurely, justice must move at the speed of commerce – particularly when a business is losing a quarter million rupees with every sunrise.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Imran Khan defamation case, Rs10 billion defamation suit, Shehbaz Sharif defamation case, Supreme Court Pakistan, SC bench defamation, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, PTI founder defamation, Lahore High Court order, Punjab government impleaded, Defamation Ordinance 2002, review petition Supreme Court, right of defence closed, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Panama Papers bribe allegation, defamation cases six months, SC defamation appeals, trial court Lahore, Justice Ayesha Malik bench, defamation proceedings stayed, PTI legal battle

Defamation Cases Must Be Decided Within Six Months, Says SC Judge

ISLAMABAD: While hearing set of appeals relating to defamation matter on Tuesday top court Justice…

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, judicial reforms Pakistan, Supreme Court reform session, Reform Action Plan RAP, death penalty cases reduction, case pendency Supreme Court, court digitization Pakistan, e-courts Pakistan, Federal Ombudsman Naveed Kamran Baloch, Law and Justice Commission Pakistan, Federal Judicial Academy, alternative dispute resolution Pakistan, case management Supreme Court, KPIs judiciary Pakistan, e-payment court fees, Public Facilitation Centre Supreme Court, barcoding file tracking, death sentence appeals Pakistan, SC case disposal rate, transparency justice system Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

All Remaining Death Sentence Appeals to Be Fixed for Hearing Within 30 Days: SC

ISLAMABAD : Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Yahya Afridi on Tuesday chaired the tenth interactive…

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…