Categories Courts

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench after its nearly Rs. 88 million solar energy system was unilaterally shut down at its factory, by the very company that installed it  – despite the mill having paid in excess of the agreed installment schedule prompting Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan to dismiss the appeal on procedural grounds while directing the trial court to decide the matter swiftly within 15 days.

The factual position reveals in the matter that M/s SS Paper & Board Mills (Private) Limited had entered into two agreements in November 15, 2024 and February 26, 2025 – with Swift Solar Energy Private Limited for installation and operation of a 600 KW and 400 KW On-Grid Solar System at its Rahim Yar Khan factory against a total consideration of Rs. 87,868,000.

The respondents completed installation whereas appellant made regular payments, reportedly exceeding the settled schedule, while also leaving its security cheques in the respondents’ possession.  Despite this, the respondents abruptly suspended the operation of the solar system without any apparent justification, throwing the appellant into a deepening financial crisis. With no power being generated and daily losses mounting to Rs. 250,000, the appellant rushed to the Civil Judge 1st Class, Rahim Yar Khan, filing a suit for specific performance of the agreements alongside an urgent stay application seeking restoration of the solar system’s operation and restraint against its dismantling or removal.

In February 24,2025 the trial court granted only partial ad interim relief – restraining the respondents from dismantling or removing the installed system – but stopped short of directing restoration of its operation. Unsatisfied with this limited relief and facing a ticking financial clock, the appellant challenged the trial court’s order before the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench through a First Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Before the High Court, counsel for the appellant Sardar Abdul Basit Khan argued saying the balance of convenience clearly tilted in his client’s favour. He contended that the appellant had not only honored all payment obligations but had paid amounts in excess of the agreed schedule, and that the respondents’ unilateral action of suspending the system was causing irreparable financial harm with every passing day.

The High Court, however, was not persuaded on the question of maintainability. Relying upon the precedent in Shariq Builders and Property Advisors v. Dr. Muhammad Faisal Murad and others (2024 MLD 32), Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan held that a clear distinction exists between an ad interim injunction – which is merely a stopgap arrangement – and a temporary injunction, which is a considered order passed after formally hearing the parties. Since the stay application was still pending before the trial court and had not been finally decided, no First Appeal lay against the limited ad interim order at this premature stage. The appeal was accordingly declared not maintainable.

While upholding procedural law firmly, the Court did not remain blind to the appellant’s genuine distress. In a moment of rare judicial empathy, Justice Awan acknowledged the urgency of the situation through a vivid proverb:

“Till the antidote reaches, the snake-bitten may die.”

Rather than leaving the appellant without a remedy, the Court converted its order into a practical lifeline – directing the Civil Judge 1st Class, Rahim Yar Khan to decide the stay application preferably within 15 days of receiving the certified copy of the order, after affording both parties adequate opportunity of hearing and applying strictly the principle of balance of convenience and inconvenience as elaborated in Muhammad Rasab and another v. Muhammad Siddiquie Chaudhry (1998 MLD 2045).

A five-page verdict,  approved for reporting, serves as a timely reminder that while appellate courts cannot be approached prematurely, justice must move at the speed of commerce – particularly when a business is losing a quarter million rupees with every sunrise.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…

AAC Gilgit-Baltistan, GB Awami Action Committee, Advocate Ehsan Ali arrested, AAC leaders arrested, anti-state speeches Gilgit, Iftar party arrest Pakistan, Anti-Terrorism Act Pakistan, ATC remand Gilgit, Rehmat Shah ATC judge, PESCO load shedding, GB Bar Council statement, GB High Court Bar Association, HRCP condemnation, human rights Gilgit-Baltistan, Advocate Nafees arrested, Meher Ali arrested, Engineer Mehboob Wali, FIR anti-terrorism Gilgit, Jutial police station FIR, AAC protest Gilgit, political arrests Pakistan, civil liberties Gilgit-Baltistan, freedom of speech Pakistan, peaceful protest rights Pakistan, anti-terrorism law misuse, GB Supreme Appellate Court Bar Association, legal community Gilgit, rule of law Gilgit-Baltistan, political suppression Pakistan, AAC chairman arrested, Asghar Shah FIR, Masoodur Rehman FIR, Engineer Nadeem FIR, Skardu public outreach, due process Pakistan, fundamental rights Pakistan, political activity restrictions, civil society Gilgit-Baltistan, lawyers arrested Pakistan, advocate illegal detention, bar council demands release, HRCP Pakistan statement, Gilgit police raids, AAC leaders remand, anti-state protest FIR, constitutional rights Pakistan, political dissent Pakistan, GB politics, Gilgit-Baltistan news, Pakistan human rights, legal fraternity Pakistan, ATC physical remand, Khudayar Mohla

Four AAC Leaders Remanded In Gilgit Over Alleged Anti-State Speeches; Bar Council And HRCP Condemn Arrests

GILGIT: In a development that has sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and civil society…

Khudayar Mohla,Depalpur court verdict, child rape murder case Pakistan, intellectually challenged girl murder, Muhammad Nadeem conviction, Additional Sessions Court Depalpur, Section 376 PPC rape sentence, Section 302 PPC murder conviction, DNA evidence Pakistan court, Punjab Forensic Science Agency PFSA, life imprisonment rapist murderer, Section 545 CrPC compensation, Anti-Rape Act 2021 Pakistan, sex offenders register Pakistan NADRA, child abduction murder Punjab, judicial compassion victim compensation, FIR 1634/2024 Depalpur, minor girl rape murder Pakistan, Sessions Judge Muhammad Amir Munir, consecutive sentences Pakistan court, child safety Punjab Pakistan

Depalpur Court Convicts Rapist-Murderer of Intellectually Challenged Girl, Orders Family Compensation

DEPALPUR: In a rare exercise of judicial compassion alongside conviction, the Sessions Court Depalpur directed…