Categories Courts

IHC seeks Centre’s Rules under PECA 2016 for PTA

The Islamabad High Court on Monday sought government’s response on a plea of Advocate Usama Khawar Ghumman urging court’s directives for Centre to frame Rules under The Prevention of Electronic Crime Act 2016 so that Pakistan Telecommunication Authority may avoid exercising its power arbitrarily while imposing ban on social media.

Making Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) as respondents on behalf of his client, Advocate Usama Khawar Ghumman sought court’s directives for government to make Rules under PECA 2016 claiming in absence of the Rules the Authority was exercising its power arbitrarily.

Earlier, top telecommunication regulator in the country PTA had imposed ban on Chinese video-sharing site TikTok but in consequence of a petition in IHC the ban was lifted.

Appearing before a single-member bench of the Chief Justice Islamabad High Court Justice Athar Minallah on Monday in the matter Advocate Usama Khawar Ghumman contended that PTA’s response is disproportionate to the alleged violation of PECA 2016 saying when restrictions have to be imposed on fundamental rights, it is a principle of constitutional law and jurisprudence that the curbs have to be least restrictive and they must be proportionate.

Advocate High Court Usama Khawar Ghumman secured degree from LUMS, Central European University and Columbia University, New York. Supreme Court appointed him as one-member Commission during 2015 to report occupational health and safety in stone crushing factories.

He urged the court to issue directives to PTA to frame Rules under PECA 2016 for structuring discretion of the Authority alleging the PTA has been exercising powers under the Act in arbitrary and unstructured manner claiming the Authority is neither competent nor empowered to put onerous restriction on the fundamental rights of citizens in the name of vague and imprecise terms like indecency and immorality. Advocate Usama Khawar Ghumman further pleaded that the PTA cannot shut down an entire platform like TikTok on the grounds that a few indecent videos have been uploaded on internet sites.

During the course of proceedings, the Chief Justice remarked that in the times of coronavirus pandemic TikTok is a source of entertainment and income for the people belonging to lower strata in the country. The Chief Justice further observed that imposition of ban on social media sites does not happen anywhere in the planet as the world is moving forward but PTA intended to reverse the progress. “Our morality should be so strong, that it is not [adversely] affected by anything”, said the Chief Justice.

While citing to a recent gang rape incident that happened on a motorway, the judge said if the government adopts this mentality then it should also close down the motorway.  Addressing the Deputy Attorney General Syed Tayyab Shah the Court said, “You cannot impose a ban on things like this in democracies,”.

Usama Khawar Ghumman alleged that the PTA has misused its authority under the PECA 2016 in a number of cases in absence of Rules of the law to which Chief Justice observed the Authority could not take decisions about content on social media on its own.

“Who is making such decisions at the PTA?” the court inquired. “Who decides what is right and what is wrong. This is why it is so important to make rules!” the Chief Justice observed.

Representing the federation in the matter, Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Syed Tayyab Shah apprised the bench that federal cabinet has approved the Rules saying the rules have been sent for publication in the official gazette.

The IHC asked the DAG to submit a copy of the Rules to the court and adjourned hearing of the case for a month.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…