Categories Courts

IHC seeks reply over legality of PTA chairman appointment

While hearing a plea seeking court orders to declare incumbent chairman Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) appointment illegal on the grounds of conflict of interest Thursday Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued notices for comprehensive reply from the respondents in the matter.

A petitioner Ameer Haider Cheema has invoked jurisdiction of the IHC claiming that the appointment of a former head of a telecom organization as the head of telecom regulator amounts to blatant conflict of interest and urged the court to declare the appointment illegal.

Advocate Umer Ijaz Gilani appeared before single-member bench of the Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani in the matter. He apprised the bench saying the petitioner has pointed out that just before he became the head of PTA, the retired major general Aamir Azeem was heading a telecom operator Special Communications Organization (SCO). He apprised the bench that the SCO comes under the Ministry of IT and Telecom, is a licensee of the PTA which competes fiercely with private telecom companies. The petitioner complains that “the appointment of a former head of a state-run telecom licensee as the head of the regulator creates a case of CONFLICT OF INTEREST which is strictly barred under Section 3(2) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996.”

Citing Lahore High Court verdict which the court pronounced during 2013 in response to petition Advocate Gilani apprised the LHC had set aside appointment of the then Chairman PTA  on the ground  that the then Chairman PTA had been served with PTCL, another state-owned telecom licensee.

During the course of the arguments, counsel for the petitioner pointed out that while serving as DG SCO, the incumbent chairman of the PTA who earlier after his appointment as DG SCO had filed a writ petition against PTA (W.P 3291/2018). Advocate Gilani submitted, “now, as Chairman PTA, he is ironically supposed to defend the petition where the SCO was trying to establish a monopoly over the AJK & GB market and to oust all private competitors”.

The petitioner counsel alleged, “While this writ petition was still pending, the DG SCO crossed over to the other side and became Chairman PTA – Since then, the petition has remained suspiciously pending. Recently, eyebrows were also raised when a $1million worth telecom spectrum was handed over by PTA to SCO while private sector licensees were charged a hefty amount, thus creating an impression of non-level playing field in the telecom sector.

“After hearing preliminary arguments of the petitioner, Justice Kayani issued notices to respondents including incumbent chairman PTA directing them to submit detailed response in the matter and adjourned hearing of the matter for two weeks.

It is pertinent to mention that earlier on June 07, the same bench has directed office to place the petition before Chief Justice Athar Minallah after hearing arguments of Advocate Gilani that connected W.P.No.3291/2018 is pending in the IHC. However, after going through a consolidation and de-clubbing process, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani adjudicated the petition on Thursday.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…