Categories Courts

IHC seeks reply over legality of PTA chairman appointment

While hearing a plea seeking court orders to declare incumbent chairman Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) appointment illegal on the grounds of conflict of interest Thursday Islamabad High Court (IHC) issued notices for comprehensive reply from the respondents in the matter.

A petitioner Ameer Haider Cheema has invoked jurisdiction of the IHC claiming that the appointment of a former head of a telecom organization as the head of telecom regulator amounts to blatant conflict of interest and urged the court to declare the appointment illegal.

Advocate Umer Ijaz Gilani appeared before single-member bench of the Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani in the matter. He apprised the bench saying the petitioner has pointed out that just before he became the head of PTA, the retired major general Aamir Azeem was heading a telecom operator Special Communications Organization (SCO). He apprised the bench that the SCO comes under the Ministry of IT and Telecom, is a licensee of the PTA which competes fiercely with private telecom companies. The petitioner complains that “the appointment of a former head of a state-run telecom licensee as the head of the regulator creates a case of CONFLICT OF INTEREST which is strictly barred under Section 3(2) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996.”

Citing Lahore High Court verdict which the court pronounced during 2013 in response to petition Advocate Gilani apprised the LHC had set aside appointment of the then Chairman PTA  on the ground  that the then Chairman PTA had been served with PTCL, another state-owned telecom licensee.

During the course of the arguments, counsel for the petitioner pointed out that while serving as DG SCO, the incumbent chairman of the PTA who earlier after his appointment as DG SCO had filed a writ petition against PTA (W.P 3291/2018). Advocate Gilani submitted, “now, as Chairman PTA, he is ironically supposed to defend the petition where the SCO was trying to establish a monopoly over the AJK & GB market and to oust all private competitors”.

The petitioner counsel alleged, “While this writ petition was still pending, the DG SCO crossed over to the other side and became Chairman PTA – Since then, the petition has remained suspiciously pending. Recently, eyebrows were also raised when a $1million worth telecom spectrum was handed over by PTA to SCO while private sector licensees were charged a hefty amount, thus creating an impression of non-level playing field in the telecom sector.

“After hearing preliminary arguments of the petitioner, Justice Kayani issued notices to respondents including incumbent chairman PTA directing them to submit detailed response in the matter and adjourned hearing of the matter for two weeks.

It is pertinent to mention that earlier on June 07, the same bench has directed office to place the petition before Chief Justice Athar Minallah after hearing arguments of Advocate Gilani that connected W.P.No.3291/2018 is pending in the IHC. However, after going through a consolidation and de-clubbing process, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani adjudicated the petition on Thursday.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…

Khudayar Mohla, Peshawar High Court, PHC glacial ice case, illegal glacial ice harvesting Pakistan, glacier protection KP, snow transportation ban KP, environmental protection Pakistan, climate change Pakistan courts, Hazara glacier exploitation, Malakand glacier cutting, KP Environmental Protection Agency report, deputy commissioners KP directives, Upper Chitral glacier protection, Swat snow harvesting ban, Mansehra glacier preservation, Upper Dir environmental case, Upper Kurram glaciers, environmental litigation Pakistan, Tariq Afghan petition, PHC environmental orders, glacier conservation Pakistan, biodiversity protection KP, flood risk climate change Pakistan, commercial ice exploitation ban, snowbound districts KP, environmental laws enforcement Pakistan

PHC Directs 6 DCs to Protect Glacial Ice in Snowbound Districts

PESHAWAR: While hearing a petition from environmentalist Tariq Afghan – who sought a government crackdown…