Categories Courts World

Trump makes final pitch to SC in fraught immunity case

Former President Donald Trump made his final pitch Thursday to the Supreme Court in his effort to pause a trial over the election subversion charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

“There are overwhelming reasons why the case should not go to trial ‘in three months or less,’” Trump told the Supreme Court in a 16-page filing. “With any other defendant, it would be virtually unthinkable for the case to go to trial so soon, and ‘wildly unfair’ to do so.”

CNN reported Trump claims former presidents must have immunity from such charges to avoid political reprisals when they leave office. So far, two lower federal courts have balked at that argument. The Supreme Court is expected to decide on Trump’s request within a few days.

With Trump’s final brief in hand, a question of timing is now squarely before the high court. The justices could deny Trump’s emergency request to temporarily block a DC Circuit ruling against him on the immunity issue or they could agree to further consider his case.

The first outcome would clear the way for a US District court in Washington, DC, to schedule a trial on the underlying election charges, which Smith is eager to resolve before the November election. The second could signal the justices may schedule oral arguments in the case later this year, potentially pushing a trial back several months.

On Monday, Trump asked the Supreme Court to block a unanimous decision from the DC Circuit handed down last week that rejected his claims of immunity from the election subversion charges. “Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency as we know it will cease to exist,” Trump told the Supreme Court. Two days later – ahead of deadline – Smith argued in his own brief that Trump had not met the standard to pause proceedings in his case. It generally takes support from five justices to secure such a pause.

“The charged crimes strike at the heart of our democracy,” Smith wrote in a filing Wednesday. “The public interest in a prompt trial is at its zenith where, as here, a former president is charged with conspiring to subvert the electoral process so that he could remain in office.”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

FCC Super Tax verdict, Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, Super Tax on high earners, Parliament taxing powers Pakistan, Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance, Super Tax legality Pakistan, Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, income tax law Pakistan, high income earners tax, oil and gas sector Super Tax, tax exemptions Pakistan, mudarabah Super Tax exemption, mutual funds tax exemption, unit trust funds Pakistan, retrospective taxation Pakistan, double taxation challenge, Supreme Court Super Tax case, High Courts Super Tax ruling, constitutional amendments Pakistan, 26th Constitutional Amendment, 27th Constitutional Amendment, revenue generation Pakistan, Rs310 billion revenue, Pakistan tax litigation, business community tax challenge, banks Super Tax Pakistan, corporate taxation Pakistan, federal budget Super Tax, economic stabilisation measures Pakistan, Operation Zarb-e-Azb levy, internally displaced persons fund, tax policy Pakistan, constitutional bench Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

FCC Validates Parliament’s Legislative Competence To Levy Super Tax

ISLAMABAD: While dismissing all pleas challenging legality of the Super Tax on high-income earners, the…

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…