Categories Courts World

Trump makes final pitch to SC in fraught immunity case

Former President Donald Trump made his final pitch Thursday to the Supreme Court in his effort to pause a trial over the election subversion charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

“There are overwhelming reasons why the case should not go to trial ‘in three months or less,’” Trump told the Supreme Court in a 16-page filing. “With any other defendant, it would be virtually unthinkable for the case to go to trial so soon, and ‘wildly unfair’ to do so.”

CNN reported Trump claims former presidents must have immunity from such charges to avoid political reprisals when they leave office. So far, two lower federal courts have balked at that argument. The Supreme Court is expected to decide on Trump’s request within a few days.

With Trump’s final brief in hand, a question of timing is now squarely before the high court. The justices could deny Trump’s emergency request to temporarily block a DC Circuit ruling against him on the immunity issue or they could agree to further consider his case.

The first outcome would clear the way for a US District court in Washington, DC, to schedule a trial on the underlying election charges, which Smith is eager to resolve before the November election. The second could signal the justices may schedule oral arguments in the case later this year, potentially pushing a trial back several months.

On Monday, Trump asked the Supreme Court to block a unanimous decision from the DC Circuit handed down last week that rejected his claims of immunity from the election subversion charges. “Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency as we know it will cease to exist,” Trump told the Supreme Court. Two days later – ahead of deadline – Smith argued in his own brief that Trump had not met the standard to pause proceedings in his case. It generally takes support from five justices to secure such a pause.

“The charged crimes strike at the heart of our democracy,” Smith wrote in a filing Wednesday. “The public interest in a prompt trial is at its zenith where, as here, a former president is charged with conspiring to subvert the electoral process so that he could remain in office.”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…

Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, FCC Pakistan judgment, tax raid without notice Pakistan, tax authorities raid powers, Justice Aamer Farooq decision, Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Pakistan, FBR enforcement powers, taxpayer raid law Pakistan, tax compliance enforcement Pakistan, super tax Pakistan ruling, Section 4(b) Income Tax Ordinance, Section 4(c) Income Tax Ordinance, Islamabad High Court contempt case, missing persons case Pakistan courts, Shehbaz Sharif contempt case, Aafia Siddiqui case legal developments, PTI cases in courts Pakistan, Article 175E Constitution Pakistan, judiciary independence debate Pakistan, Pakistan constitutional court performance, Khudayar Mohla Advocate

FCC Says Tax Authorities Can Conduct Raids Without Prior Notice

ISLAMABAD: In another legal reprieve for the government, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that tax…

Khudayar Mohla Advocate, Editor Law Today Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC, Tirah Valley, Tirah evacuation, illegal evacuation, unconstitutional evacuation, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, federal government, IDPs, internally displaced persons, Zarak Khan Afridi, Barrister Saud Javed Dawar, Advocate Mohammad Yousaf Orakzai, military operation, Khyber tribal district, relief and rehabilitation, compensation for displaced, safe return, lawful procedure, KP Assembly, Article 232, Pakistani courts, preliminary hearing, displaced population, extreme weather, snow, civilian safety, federal response, provincial response, court directives, Pakistan news, legal proceedings, Peshawar news

PHC Seeks Centre, KPK Response on Tirah Evacuation Plea

PESHAWAR: While issuing notices to federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments on Wednesday in response to …