Categories Courts

CCP Imposes Rs. 170M Penalty on Frozen Dessert Makers for Misleading Advertising

While exercising its jurisdiction on Friday Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed penalties of Rs 75 million each on two manufacturers of frozen desserts for misleading consumers by falsely advertising their products as ‘ice cream’.

The Commission initiated these proceedings in response to complaint of M/s Pakistan Fruit Juice Company (Private) Limited – the manufacturers of “Hico” ice cream, alleging about two undertakings engaged in deceptive marketing by portraying their ‘frozen desserts’ as ice cream through televised advertisements and social media campaigns.

The Commission issued directives for a formal enquiry into the matter and later issued show cause notices to M/s Unilever Pakistan and M/s Friesland Campina Engro, manufacturers and distributors of frozen desserts under the brand names of ‘Walls’ and ‘Omore,’ respectively.

A bench of the CCP comprising members Salman Amin and Saeed Ahmed Nawaz conducted these hearings. The bench while imposing the penalty in its order, inter-alia referred to the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) PS 969-2010 and the Punjab Pure Food Regulations 2018. The Authority and Regulations define ‘frozen dessert’ and ‘ice cream’ as two distinct products.

Notably as per the standards, ‘ice cream’ is made from milk, cream, or other dairy products, while “frozen desserts” are prepared from a pasteurized mix consisting of a combination of milk, milk products, and edible vegetable oils.
Additionally, a penalty of PKR 20 million was also imposed on M/s Unilever Pakistan for conducting and disseminating false comparisons of their products as heathier to the dairy ice cream in its advertisements, which constitutes a violation of Section 10(2)(c) of the Competition Act.

The order has also referenced international jurisdictions, including the USA, Australia, and India, wherein food quality standards authorities have specified the term ‘ice cream’ exclusively for dairy-based products. Noticeably, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in USA had also penalized an undertaking for marketing and misbranding its frozen dessert products by labeling them as ‘ice cream.’

The CCP in the order has also issued directives to the undertakings to desist from presenting frozen desserts as ice cream in their advertisements, as it leads to distribution of false and misleading information to the consumers, prohibited pursuant to section 10 of the Competition Act.

Both companies are thus required to remove such advertisements from digital platforms also and make adequate disclosure about their products. A compliance report in this regard is to be submitted to the CCP within 30 days of the Order.
The CCP under the law is mandated to ensure open competition in all spheres of commercial and economic activities and to protect consumers from any anticompetitive behaviours, including any deceptive marketing practices.

Author

Amna Anwar, Lidia, LLB, IIUI, Islamabad, Advocate Amna Anwar, Editor

The writer is an LLB student and contributes to Law Today. Can be contacted at amnaanwar@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…