Categories Courts

IHC bars MCI from action against street vendors

Unconstitutional acts of some people at the helm of Capital Development Authority and Islamabad police affairs have been challenged before Islamabad High Court (IHC) as they committed grave violation of fundamental rights of as many as 18 street venders while confining them all day long and then precured their statements under coercion that these vendors will not carry on trade in Islamabad.

Invoking jurisdiction of the IHC on behalf of 18 street venders two days ago, advocate Ms Imaan Zainab Hazir pointed out sheer violation of guaranteed constitutional rights like right to life, dignity, to engage in trade and equality before the law.

Making the CDA, Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI) and others as respondents in the matter, advocate Ms Imaan Zainab Hazir apprised single-member bench of the Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan  the petitioners are hawkers of the CDA. They are aggrieved that the CDA is harassing them and not allowing them to conduct their business.

A two-page order of the court available with Law Today described, “Counsel apprised the court that the police had arrested as many as 13 street vendors on Sunday, June 30,2024, kept them in confinement all day long, and took statements from them under coercion that they would not practice their trade within Islamabad. She presses for interim relief prayed in the main petition for that reason and makes a request that the main case also be taken up for today (June 05,2024)”.

Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan , Muhammad Shahbaz Vs MCI through Administrative etc, Capital Development Authority, CDA, Hadi Ali Chattha, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Metropolitan Corporation, MCI, Editor, Khudayar Mohla, RTI Consultant Khudayar Mohla, Consumer Rights Lawyer Khudayar Mohla, Merger and Acquisition Lawyer Khudayar Mohla, Advocate Imaan Zainab Hazir, Ehsaas Rehribaan Program
Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan

Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan allowed the request of the petitioners and stated in main order of the matter, “Counsel refers to the memo of petition and the grounds stated therein, which in summary, depict that the petitioners fundamental rights to life, dignity, to engage in trade, and equality under Articles 9, 14, 18 and 25 of the Constitution are being violated for the reason of their licenses not being renewed and, in some cases, not being granted in the first place, despite their entitlement to that effect”. It is pertinent to mention that advocate Imaan informed the court that many of these street vendors got into this trade as a consequence of representation by the government under the Ehsaas Rehribaan Program introduced by the government around 2021. She further informed the court that as a consequence of which they were extended bank loans and other facilities which they would now be unable to pay if their licenses were not renewed.

After a brief hearing of the matter the IHC issued directives to respondents to depute knowledgeable officers to appear in person before the court on next date of hearing. The bench also issued directives to respondents to not take any action against the venders saying, “In the meantime no coercive action against any of the street vendors shall be taken”.

The court also directed to the its office to ensure communication of the order to respondents through telephone. The bench will take up the matter tomorrow on Monday.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…