Categories Courts

CB to Hear Plea Questioning Feb 8 General Election Transparency

The top court has decided to hear a number of politically-important cases during the week commencing from December 09 next week, including a plea of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) seeking a probe into alleged rigging in the February 8 general elections and petition relating to trials of civilians in military courts.

A seven-member Constitutional Bench, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, will hear the PTI’s appeal against the Registrar Office’s objections to the petition on December 9, according to the cause list issued here on Friday.

The other members of the Constitutional Bench are Justice Jamal Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hassan Rizvi, Justice Masarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Afghan and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.

A total five petitions are listed for hearing on December 9. Usually, a single apex court judge hears the appeals against Registrar’s objections in his chamber but this matter has been listed for hearing by the bench.

During the hearing of reserved seats case by the full court, Justice Athar Minallah had repeatedly questioned about the pendency of the petition, seeking a probe into the alleged rigging in February 8 general elections.

In that case, the majority judges held that the PTI was entitled to the reserved seats of National and provincial assemblies. However, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif expressed apprehension that new chief justice might announce an audit of February 8 elections.

There had been a debate among the legal circles as to what the Constitutional Bench would do in this case, as Article 225 of the Constitution clearly stated that election disputes could only be decided by tribunals.

Previously, the then Rawalpindi commissioner had also levelled allegations of rigging in the elections but no one, including the then chief justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa, invited him to prove his claims.

The PTI and its founder Imran Khan had filed the joint petition through their lawyer, Hamid Khan, requesting the judicial commission to probe into the alleged rigging in the February 2024 general elections.

The petition named the federation of Pakistan, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) as respondents.

“That a judicial commission, consisting of serving Supreme Court judges holding no bias towards anyone, be formed to inquire, audit, and examine the manner and process of the general elections of February 8, 2024, and the developments that took place thereafter of compiling false and fraudulent results rendering winners into losers and losers into winners,” the petition stated.

It further requested the top court to immediately suspend all consequential acts of forming governments at the federal level and in Punjab at the provincial level, until the results of the judicial probe were made public.

“There were obvious and apparent developments on the 8th and 9th of February 2024, witnessed by the whole country, that have completely exposed this fraudulent game of turning losers into winners,” the PTI contended in its petition.

Military courts

The cause list of the Constitutional Bench for the upcoming judicial week showed that the bench would also hear two suo motu cases on December 9 – one regarding the murder of journalist Arshad Sharif and the other on deaths of children in Mithi, Sindh.

On December 10, a petition against the formation of a judicial commission on the May 9, 2023 violence and the trial of civilians in military courts has been scheduled for hearing. The bench would also hear 1,178 tax cases on that day.

Besides, the bench would hear on December 10 an application for transfer of PTI founder from Adiala Jail to a Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Jail due to security concerns. The application was filed by a petitioner named Muhammad Qayyum Khan.

The Registrar’s Office had raised objections to the petition. However, the seven-member constitutional bench would hear the petition along with the registrar’s objections, according to the cause list.

A phone tapping case which was pending since 1993, has been scheduled for hearing on December 11. The PTI founder’s petition against Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja had been fixed for hearing on December 11.

The case of formation of a judicial commission to investigate the February 8, 2024 general elections had also been fixed for hearing on December 11, according to the cause list.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…