Categories Courts

CCP Imposes Rs. 170M Penalty on Frozen Dessert Makers for Misleading Advertising

While exercising its jurisdiction on Friday Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed penalties of Rs 75 million each on two manufacturers of frozen desserts for misleading consumers by falsely advertising their products as ‘ice cream’.

The Commission initiated these proceedings in response to complaint of M/s Pakistan Fruit Juice Company (Private) Limited – the manufacturers of “Hico” ice cream, alleging about two undertakings engaged in deceptive marketing by portraying their ‘frozen desserts’ as ice cream through televised advertisements and social media campaigns.

The Commission issued directives for a formal enquiry into the matter and later issued show cause notices to M/s Unilever Pakistan and M/s Friesland Campina Engro, manufacturers and distributors of frozen desserts under the brand names of ‘Walls’ and ‘Omore,’ respectively.

A bench of the CCP comprising members Salman Amin and Saeed Ahmed Nawaz conducted these hearings. The bench while imposing the penalty in its order, inter-alia referred to the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) PS 969-2010 and the Punjab Pure Food Regulations 2018. The Authority and Regulations define ‘frozen dessert’ and ‘ice cream’ as two distinct products.

Notably as per the standards, ‘ice cream’ is made from milk, cream, or other dairy products, while “frozen desserts” are prepared from a pasteurized mix consisting of a combination of milk, milk products, and edible vegetable oils.
Additionally, a penalty of PKR 20 million was also imposed on M/s Unilever Pakistan for conducting and disseminating false comparisons of their products as heathier to the dairy ice cream in its advertisements, which constitutes a violation of Section 10(2)(c) of the Competition Act.

The order has also referenced international jurisdictions, including the USA, Australia, and India, wherein food quality standards authorities have specified the term ‘ice cream’ exclusively for dairy-based products. Noticeably, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in USA had also penalized an undertaking for marketing and misbranding its frozen dessert products by labeling them as ‘ice cream.’

The CCP in the order has also issued directives to the undertakings to desist from presenting frozen desserts as ice cream in their advertisements, as it leads to distribution of false and misleading information to the consumers, prohibited pursuant to section 10 of the Competition Act.

Both companies are thus required to remove such advertisements from digital platforms also and make adequate disclosure about their products. A compliance report in this regard is to be submitted to the CCP within 30 days of the Order.
The CCP under the law is mandated to ensure open competition in all spheres of commercial and economic activities and to protect consumers from any anticompetitive behaviours, including any deceptive marketing practices.

Author

Amna Anwar, Lidia, LLB, IIUI, Islamabad, Advocate Amna Anwar, Editor

The writer is an LLB student and contributes to Law Today. Can be contacted at amnaanwar@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…

AAC Gilgit-Baltistan, GB Awami Action Committee, Advocate Ehsan Ali arrested, AAC leaders arrested, anti-state speeches Gilgit, Iftar party arrest Pakistan, Anti-Terrorism Act Pakistan, ATC remand Gilgit, Rehmat Shah ATC judge, PESCO load shedding, GB Bar Council statement, GB High Court Bar Association, HRCP condemnation, human rights Gilgit-Baltistan, Advocate Nafees arrested, Meher Ali arrested, Engineer Mehboob Wali, FIR anti-terrorism Gilgit, Jutial police station FIR, AAC protest Gilgit, political arrests Pakistan, civil liberties Gilgit-Baltistan, freedom of speech Pakistan, peaceful protest rights Pakistan, anti-terrorism law misuse, GB Supreme Appellate Court Bar Association, legal community Gilgit, rule of law Gilgit-Baltistan, political suppression Pakistan, AAC chairman arrested, Asghar Shah FIR, Masoodur Rehman FIR, Engineer Nadeem FIR, Skardu public outreach, due process Pakistan, fundamental rights Pakistan, political activity restrictions, civil society Gilgit-Baltistan, lawyers arrested Pakistan, advocate illegal detention, bar council demands release, HRCP Pakistan statement, Gilgit police raids, AAC leaders remand, anti-state protest FIR, constitutional rights Pakistan, political dissent Pakistan, GB politics, Gilgit-Baltistan news, Pakistan human rights, legal fraternity Pakistan, ATC physical remand, Khudayar Mohla

Four AAC Leaders Remanded In Gilgit Over Alleged Anti-State Speeches; Bar Council And HRCP Condemn Arrests

GILGIT: In a development that has sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and civil society…