Categories Courts

LHC Disposes of Long-Standing Ojhri Camp Land Dispute Through Amicable Mediation

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court (LHC), Rawalpindi Bench, has issued a detailed verdict approving a settlement reached through mediation and arbitration in a land dispute dating back to 1983. The decision marks the conclusion of a 43-year-old compensation case involving the acquisition of 259 Kanals and 03 Marlas of land by the state.

The verdict is self-explanatory: in a judicial system often criticized for its backlog and procedural delays, the successful resolution of the Ojhri Camp land dispute serves as a compelling paradigm of how arbitration can resolve even the most deeply rooted legal conflicts. By moving away from the rigid, adversarial nature of the courtroom toward a consensual framework, a dispute that spanned nearly half a century was finally laid to rest. This outcome proves that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is not merely a secondary option, but a vital tool for achieving swift and lasting justice.

A nearly 43-year-old land dispute over the Ojhri Camp area has been amicably resolved through arbitration, bringing to an end a long-running compensation case linked to state land acquisition. Issuing the verdict in response to pleas pending since 1983, Justice Jawad Hassan approved a settlement reached through the arbitration process. Under the settlement, compensation amounting to Rs2.30 billion has been paid to the affectees of 259 Kanals and three Marlas of land at Ojhri Camp. The landowners agreed to accept the compensation determined by the GHQ Board in 2014, the court noted.

“The resolution of the 43-year-old Ojhri Camp dispute proves that arbitration is not merely a secondary option, but a vital tool for achieving swift and lasting justice.”

While approving the settlement, the court declared that the legal right of the affectees to seek enhancement of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act would remain protected. It clarified that the affectees could still approach relevant courts by filing references for an increase in compensation. The petitions for compensation were originally filed in 1983 after the Pakistan Army acquired the land. The court record also noted that the tragic Ojhri Camp incident of April 10, 1986 occurred on the same site.

In its written order, the court stressed that mediation committees and arbitration institutions are an urgent necessity for Pakistan’s judicial system, observing that such mechanisms save valuable time, money and energy for litigants. Following the approval of the settlement, the LHC disposed of the writ petitions and all related applications.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Imran Khan defamation case, Rs10 billion defamation suit, Shehbaz Sharif defamation case, Supreme Court Pakistan, SC bench defamation, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, PTI founder defamation, Lahore High Court order, Punjab government impleaded, Defamation Ordinance 2002, review petition Supreme Court, right of defence closed, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Panama Papers bribe allegation, defamation cases six months, SC defamation appeals, trial court Lahore, Justice Ayesha Malik bench, defamation proceedings stayed, PTI legal battle

Defamation Cases Must Be Decided Within Six Months, Says SC Judge

ISLAMABAD: While hearing set of appeals relating to defamation matter on Tuesday top court Justice…

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, judicial reforms Pakistan, Supreme Court reform session, Reform Action Plan RAP, death penalty cases reduction, case pendency Supreme Court, court digitization Pakistan, e-courts Pakistan, Federal Ombudsman Naveed Kamran Baloch, Law and Justice Commission Pakistan, Federal Judicial Academy, alternative dispute resolution Pakistan, case management Supreme Court, KPIs judiciary Pakistan, e-payment court fees, Public Facilitation Centre Supreme Court, barcoding file tracking, death sentence appeals Pakistan, SC case disposal rate, transparency justice system Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

All Remaining Death Sentence Appeals to Be Fixed for Hearing Within 30 Days: SC

ISLAMABAD : Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Yahya Afridi on Tuesday chaired the tenth interactive…

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…