Categories Courts

A five-member larger bench may adjudicate Afghan Refugees deportation pleas – SC seeks federation response in the matter

In its written order the Supreme Court sought concise statement from federation in response to plea urging to halt Afghan refugees’ generation deportations orders who were born in Pakistan. It has been reported largely that top court resumed hearing the pleas of human rights groups to stop the deportations of Afghans who were born in Pakistan and those who would be at risk if they were returned to Afghanistan.

International media reported that more than 370,000 Afghans have fled Pakistan since October 01 after Pakistan said it would expel more than a million undocumented refugees and migrants, mostly Afghans, amid a row with Kabul over charges that it harbours anti-Pakistan armed groups.

Pakistan said most Afghans have left voluntarily, a claim rejected by Kabul, which has called the Pakistani action “unilateral” and “humiliating”. “Due to the urgency, as thousands of people are suffering on daily basis, I’ve requested the court to take up the case as early as next week,”

Supreme Court of Pakistan, Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani, Afghan Refugees, Kabul, Human Rights Group, NATO, US, Balochsitan, Police, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Justice Yahya Afridi, Mrs. Justice Ayesha A.Malik
Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani

A young Supreme Court lawyer Umar Ijaz Gilani, representing the rights activists has been cited saying thousands of undocumented Afghans have gone underground in Pakistan to avoid deportation, fearing for their lives if they return to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan following a hasty and chaotic withdrawal of United States-led Western forces in 2021.

It is pertinent to mention that Pakistan has long hosted about 1.7 million Afghans, most of whom fled the country during the 1979-1989 Soviet occupation. In addition, more than half a million people fled Afghanistan when the Taliban seized power in August 2021 in the final weeks of a US and NATO pull-out. Human rights activists, United Nations officials and others have denounced Pakistan’s policy and urged Islamabad to reconsider. The petition came a day after an official in Balochistan announced that the southwestern province is setting a target of 10,000 Afghans who are in the country illegally for police to arrest and deport every day.

Filing the petitions on behalf of remedy seekers, Advocate Umer Ijaz Gilani sought court directives for federal government to stop from detaining, forcefully deporting, or otherwise harassing anyone born in Pakistan with a claim to birthright citizenship in accordance with Section 4 of the Citizenship Act, 1951, and the ruling of the Islamabad High Court in 2021 case of Hafiz Hamdullah Saboor. The petitioners submitted the federal government should be directed to allow the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and its partner organisations to register, expedite the processing, and decide on all asylum-seeking applications filed by foreigners currently residing in Pakistan. Advocate Gilani contended that the federal government should also be directed to permit UNHCR and its partner organisations to register, expedite the processing, and decide on all asylum-seeking applications in Pakistan.

During last week, a three-member bench of the top court comprising Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Justice Yahya Afridi and Mrs. Justice Ayesha A.Malik resumed hearing of the pleas in the matter. After a brief argument of Advocate Umer Ijaz Gilani, the court find that the matter involves interpretation of Constitutional provisions, consequently it requires consideration of a larger 5-member bench.

Among others, the bench issued notices to federal government through principal law officer of the country directing him to submit a concise statement in the matter.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Rawalpindi Anti-Narcotics Court, second Anti-Narcotics Court Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force court Rawalpindi, drug cases backlog Rawalpindi, 500 pending narcotics cases, special anti-narcotics courts Punjab, Rawalpindi division judiciary, speedy disposal narcotics cases, Punjab government anti-drug measures, Counter Narcotics Force Punjab, drug smuggling crackdown Pakistan, narcotics cases Pakistan, Additional District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force, Punjab Government, drug control courts Pakistan, special courts Pakistan, narcotics trial courts, criminal justice system Punjab, rising drug cases Rawalpindi, law and order Punjab, judiciary expansion Rawalpindi, anti-drug campaign Pakistan, court reforms Punjab, narcotics prosecution Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla.

Punjab Govt Approves Second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi Division

RAWALPINDI: Approval has been granted for the establishment of a second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi. The…

Climate Justice: UN Urged to Codify ICJ Obligations in New Global Resolution

Governments must not squander the opportunity to turn the International Court of Justice’s 2025 Advisory…

LHC Sets Aside PRA Decision Levying Multi-Million-Rupee Sales Tax on FWE-II

RAWALPINDI: While authoring the 16-page verdict in a matter relating to a multi-million-rupee sales tax…