Categories Courts World

US Court Approves Stay Applications of ICC-Affiliated Law Professors who Challenge Trump Order

Granting stay order in response to plea of two law professors, Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York issued directives to Trump administration from pursing penalties against international law experts Mr. Rona and Ms. Davis.

The New York Times reported  a federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred the Trump administration from imposing penalties on two law professors over their involvement with the International Criminal Court, finding that the threat violated their First Amendment rights.

In a 22-page opinion, Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York concluded that the president had used the threat of legal penalties to force Gabor Rona and Lisa Davis, both law professors in New York, to abandon their association with the International Court in The Hague, which prosecutes cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The judge definitively barred the government from taking any action to follow through on the threat.

Mr. Rona and Ms. Davis had each advised the I.C.C.’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, or supported his office’s work through its investigations and prosecutions, and have written and spoken extensively about international law.

The United States is not among the 125 countries that are party to the Rome Statute, which created the International Criminal Court, but has supported a number of its investigations, including in cases involving Ukraine, Sudan and Myanmar.

Under an executive order President Trump signed in February, the professors faced the possibility of criminal and civil penalties because of their association with the court. The I.C.C. has investigated the United States and Israel, and last year issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and his former defense minister related to their handling of the war in Gaza.

Mr. Trump’s order carried the possibility of jail terms of up to 20 years for anyone supporting the International Criminal Court in its work.

Judge Furman’s ruling mirrored the conclusions of another judge during President Trump’s first term, who found in January 2021 that a similar executive order Mr. Trump had signed likely forced Mr. Rona and three other professors to abandon or reconsider speech and legal advocacy out of fear that the order could be enforced against them.

At the time, Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Federal District Court for the for the Southern District of New York found that the group, who had mounted a legal challenge, were likely to succeed.

Upon taking office, former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. rescinded Mr. Trump’s original order, but when Mr. Trump returned to office this year, he revived much of its substance — and some identical language — in the order he signed in February. The order cited presidential powers under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act — the same act he has used to justify many tariffs — and accused the I.C.C. of abusing its power.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, LHC, Chief Justice Aalia Neelum, Justice Ali Zia Bajwa, NCCIA, Syed Khurram Ali, Khudayar Mohla, social media campaign, judiciary defamation, cybercrime Pakistan, PTA Pakistan, YouTube, X Twitter, Facebook, Siyasi Dera, Mitha Gee, Ihsanullah Chattha, online harassment, FIR registration, lawyer petition, Pakistani judiciary, protecting judiciary, judicial integrity, online regulation, digital evidence, Nadra facial recognition, freedom of expression Pakistan, Pakistani courts news, Khudayar Mohla

NCCIA Arrests Eight Over Derogatory Social Media Campaign Against LHC Judges

LAHORE: Appearing before the Lahore High Court on Thursday, a top official of the National…

Khudayar Mohla, Judicial Commission of Pakistan, JCP meeting 2026, Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, Islamabad High Court judges, Balochistan High Court judges, ad-hoc judges Pakistan, Justice Ayub Khan, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, IHC judge appointments, BHC judge appointments, JCP confirmation, Pakistani judiciary news, judge competency controversy, Supreme Court Pakistan, judicial appointments Pakistan, SHC judge appointments, judicial policy Pakistan, Judicial Commission rules 2024

JCP Approves 4 Ad-Hoc Judges for IHC and BHC; One Appointment Declined

ISLAMABAD: The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, approved four…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, SCBA Pakistan, Advocates-on-Record, AOR facilitation center, litigant facilitation Pakistan, access to justice Pakistan, court service delivery, legal aid Pakistan, efficient justice system, transparency in courts

SCBA Inaugurates AOR & Litigant Facilitation Center at SC – AORs Urge Leadership to Review Facility Standards for Smooth Operations

ISLAMABAD: As part of on-going reforms aimed at strengthening service delivery and enhancing access to…