Categories Courts World

US Court Approves Stay Applications of ICC-Affiliated Law Professors who Challenge Trump Order

Granting stay order in response to plea of two law professors, Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York issued directives to Trump administration from pursing penalties against international law experts Mr. Rona and Ms. Davis.

The New York Times reported  a federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred the Trump administration from imposing penalties on two law professors over their involvement with the International Criminal Court, finding that the threat violated their First Amendment rights.

In a 22-page opinion, Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York concluded that the president had used the threat of legal penalties to force Gabor Rona and Lisa Davis, both law professors in New York, to abandon their association with the International Court in The Hague, which prosecutes cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The judge definitively barred the government from taking any action to follow through on the threat.

Mr. Rona and Ms. Davis had each advised the I.C.C.’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, or supported his office’s work through its investigations and prosecutions, and have written and spoken extensively about international law.

The United States is not among the 125 countries that are party to the Rome Statute, which created the International Criminal Court, but has supported a number of its investigations, including in cases involving Ukraine, Sudan and Myanmar.

Under an executive order President Trump signed in February, the professors faced the possibility of criminal and civil penalties because of their association with the court. The I.C.C. has investigated the United States and Israel, and last year issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and his former defense minister related to their handling of the war in Gaza.

Mr. Trump’s order carried the possibility of jail terms of up to 20 years for anyone supporting the International Criminal Court in its work.

Judge Furman’s ruling mirrored the conclusions of another judge during President Trump’s first term, who found in January 2021 that a similar executive order Mr. Trump had signed likely forced Mr. Rona and three other professors to abandon or reconsider speech and legal advocacy out of fear that the order could be enforced against them.

At the time, Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Federal District Court for the for the Southern District of New York found that the group, who had mounted a legal challenge, were likely to succeed.

Upon taking office, former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. rescinded Mr. Trump’s original order, but when Mr. Trump returned to office this year, he revived much of its substance — and some identical language — in the order he signed in February. The order cited presidential powers under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act — the same act he has used to justify many tariffs — and accused the I.C.C. of abusing its power.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Peace Palace Library, The Hague, Pakistani legal scholarship, Sharafat A. Chaudhry, Juvenile Justice Theory and Practice, Juvenile Justice System Act 2018, JJSA 2018 Pakistan, International Court of Justice ICJ, Peace Palace The Hague, Embassy of Pakistan Netherlands, School for Law and Development SLD, Rabia Mustafa, juvenile justice Pakistan, child justice system Pakistan, Convention on the Rights of the Child CRC, CEDAW international law, juvenile justice reform, child rights law Pakistan, international legal scholarship, Dutch juvenile justice system, adolescent criminal law Netherlands, comparative juvenile justice, rehabilitation and diversion in juvenile justice, youth justice reform, international human rights law, Pakistani jurist Sharafat Chaudhry, legal reform Pakistan, global legal research libraries, Peace Palace Library collection, Pakistani law books international recognition, child protection legislation Pakistan, juvenile offenders rehabilitation, international law institutions The Hague, legal scholarship Pakistan, justice sector governance Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

Pakistani Jurist Sharafat A. Chaudhry’s Juvenile Justice Book Inducted into Peace Palace Library, The Hague

THE HAGUE : Pakistani legal scholarship has secured a prestigious milestone as jurist, advocate, and…

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…