Categories Courts

AJK HC Suspends USCP Employees Removal Order

While removing suspension order of more than 50 daily wagers of Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan, the AJK High Court has decided to adjudicate the plea seeking Corporation employees’ service regularization.

The Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (USCP) is a state-owned enterprise – operates chain stores throughout the country that provide basic commodities to the general public at prices which are lower than the open market because the government subsidizes them whereas it has operation in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).

Filing petition on behalf of his clients, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani has urged the court to determine legality of the USCP orders saying instead of regularization of these daily wagers employees services, the Corporation has issued removal from services orders.

Editor, Khudayar Mohla, AJK High Court, USCP daily wagers, Utility Stores Corporation Pakistan, employees regularization, USCP removal orders, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani, Justice Shahid Bahar, National Assembly Standing Committee, court ruling, subsidized commodities, AJK legal news, labor rights, government subsidies, employment law Pakistan, daily wage workers, judicial review
Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani with USCP employees after hearing of the matter

Appearing before single-member bench of the Justice Shahid Bahar, advocates Syed Abdul Basit Gillani and Syed Mazher Azad Gillani argued saying the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Industries and Production in 2017, had issued directives to the USCP to regularize their services after scrutiny and verification at the Zonal Office. Barrister Gillani apprised the court none of the petitioners was regularized. Instead, they were removed from their services. After brief hearing of the arguments, Justice Shahid Bahar of the AJK High Court suspends relieving orders of the petitioners and directed the USCP to restrain from removing any of its daily wage employees. Declaring the employees’ removal orders null and void, the court ruled that “as per the stance of the petitioners, the said orders are liable to set-at-naught.” Later, the court adjourned the case till April 14,2025.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…