Categories Courts

All eyes are on top court verdict over legality of blocking no-confidence vote against PM Khan

While hearing arguments of PML-N counsel challenging legality of National Assembly’s deputy speaker dismissal of no-confidence motion against prime minister the top court Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial said the court has nothing to do with matters of state and foreign policy but to examine legality of the speaker office act in the matter.

The NA Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri had linked the motion to a “foreign conspiracy” to topple the PTI government and ruled that the motion was contradictory to Article 5 of the Constitution. Subsequently, the CJP had taken suo motu notice of the matter, following which a larger bench was formed to hear the case.

The five-member bench is headed by the CJP and includes Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail.

During the hearing of the matter on Tuesday, the CJP said the court would not interfere in policy matters and would focus on the deputy speaker’s ruling, the PML-N’s counsel proposed that the apex court may seek an “in-camera briefing about the foreign conspiracy from the intelligence chief”. “Right now we are looking at the law and Constitution,” the CJP replied, adding that all the respondents would be told to focus on this matter at the moment.

“We prefer that a decision be taken on this matter only,” CJP Bandial said. “We want to see if the court can review the ruling of the deputy speaker.” The court, he added, didn’t interfere in the state or foreign policy. “We don’t want to indulge in policy matters.”

A member of the bench Justice Ahsan expressed the court only wanted to see constitutional matters for now. The PML-N’s counsel, however, argued that the court could judicially review an illegal and unconstitutional move.

Justice Munib Akhtar said the NA and provincial assembly were masters of their respective houses. The distribution of powers was also enshrined in the constitution, the judge added. “We have referred to six court verdicts that clarify the jurisdiction of Article 69,” Khan said adding that the speaker confirmed the deputy speaker’s ruling. He also questioned the transfer of power from the speaker to the deputy speaker. Justice Ahsan said Naeem Bukhari, the counsel for NA Speaker Asad Qaiser, would aid the court on the matter.

Later, the court adjourned the hearing till 11:30am on Wednesday (tomorrow).

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…

Khudayar Mohla, Peshawar High Court, PHC glacial ice case, illegal glacial ice harvesting Pakistan, glacier protection KP, snow transportation ban KP, environmental protection Pakistan, climate change Pakistan courts, Hazara glacier exploitation, Malakand glacier cutting, KP Environmental Protection Agency report, deputy commissioners KP directives, Upper Chitral glacier protection, Swat snow harvesting ban, Mansehra glacier preservation, Upper Dir environmental case, Upper Kurram glaciers, environmental litigation Pakistan, Tariq Afghan petition, PHC environmental orders, glacier conservation Pakistan, biodiversity protection KP, flood risk climate change Pakistan, commercial ice exploitation ban, snowbound districts KP, environmental laws enforcement Pakistan

PHC Directs 6 DCs to Protect Glacial Ice in Snowbound Districts

PESHAWAR: While hearing a petition from environmentalist Tariq Afghan – who sought a government crackdown…