Categories Courts

All eyes are on top court verdict over legality of blocking no-confidence vote against PM Khan

While hearing arguments of PML-N counsel challenging legality of National Assembly’s deputy speaker dismissal of no-confidence motion against prime minister the top court Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial said the court has nothing to do with matters of state and foreign policy but to examine legality of the speaker office act in the matter.

The NA Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri had linked the motion to a “foreign conspiracy” to topple the PTI government and ruled that the motion was contradictory to Article 5 of the Constitution. Subsequently, the CJP had taken suo motu notice of the matter, following which a larger bench was formed to hear the case.

The five-member bench is headed by the CJP and includes Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail.

During the hearing of the matter on Tuesday, the CJP said the court would not interfere in policy matters and would focus on the deputy speaker’s ruling, the PML-N’s counsel proposed that the apex court may seek an “in-camera briefing about the foreign conspiracy from the intelligence chief”. “Right now we are looking at the law and Constitution,” the CJP replied, adding that all the respondents would be told to focus on this matter at the moment.

“We prefer that a decision be taken on this matter only,” CJP Bandial said. “We want to see if the court can review the ruling of the deputy speaker.” The court, he added, didn’t interfere in the state or foreign policy. “We don’t want to indulge in policy matters.”

A member of the bench Justice Ahsan expressed the court only wanted to see constitutional matters for now. The PML-N’s counsel, however, argued that the court could judicially review an illegal and unconstitutional move.

Justice Munib Akhtar said the NA and provincial assembly were masters of their respective houses. The distribution of powers was also enshrined in the constitution, the judge added. “We have referred to six court verdicts that clarify the jurisdiction of Article 69,” Khan said adding that the speaker confirmed the deputy speaker’s ruling. He also questioned the transfer of power from the speaker to the deputy speaker. Justice Ahsan said Naeem Bukhari, the counsel for NA Speaker Asad Qaiser, would aid the court on the matter.

Later, the court adjourned the hearing till 11:30am on Wednesday (tomorrow).

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Supreme Court of Pakistan, right to privacy, DNA test ruling, parentage confirmation, paternity dispute Pakistan, Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 9 Right to Liberty, human dignity, judicial system Pakistan, Khalid Hameed case, fundamental rights, personal autonomy, bodily integrity, unauthorized medical procedures, sanctity of family life, due process, legal justification for DNA test, inheritance dispute law, Anti-Corruption Court Pakpattan, Lahore High Court revision petition, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, ocietal embarrassment, psychological stigma, privacy rights, protection of women's reputation, moral integrity of the mother, genetic blueprint security, personal data protection, surveillance and disclosure, individual self-determination, Supreme Court ruling on DNA testing without consent, right to privacy under Article 14 Pakistan, legal protection against paternity challenges, impact of mandatory DNA tests on dignity, protection of genetic information in Pakistan law.

SC Bars Compulsory Paternity DNA Test, Citing Protection of Mother’s Character

ISLAMABAD: Affirming the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has set aside a subordinate court’s…

Lahore High Court, LHC Rawalpindi Bench, Justice Jawad Hassan, mediation, Alternate Dispute Resolution Act 2017, Shamsabad land dispute, Ojhri Camp compensation, military land dispute, land acquisition Pakistan, Panorama Shopping Centre, Article 199 Constitution, amicable settlement, land compensation Pakistan, Pakistan Army land dispute, legal mediation Pakistan, court-directed mediation, Pakistan land litigation, landowners dispute, fair market compensation, out-of-court settlement, Defence Ministry land, Pakistan judiciary, civil dispute resolution, structured mediation, Air Defence Command Pakistan, LHC directives, decades-old land dispute, Pakistan legal news

Mediation Mandated: Justice Jawad Hassan Sets Three-Month Deadline in Ojhri Camp Land Case

RAWALPINDI: Mediation – a process in which a mediator facilitates communication and negotiation to help…

Landmark Policy Shift: SC Streamlines Case Fixation for Litigant Accessibility

ISLAMABAD – In a significant move aimed at dramatically enhancing the efficiency of its operations and…