Categories Courts

SC clubs JI’ plea challenging electricity tariffs with IPPs case

After removing Registrar Office objections, the Supreme Court has decided to hear Jamaat-e-Islami’s plea challenging fuel price adjustment surcharges in electricity bills.

During the hearing, Justice Jamal Mandokhail remarked that the taxes collected through electricity bills go into the national treasury. Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi pointed out that NEPRA conducts hearings on electricity tariffs and questioned whether Jamaat-e-Islami had ever raised objections during NEPRA’s proceedings.

Justice Rizvi further stated that electricity theft is a major cause of line losses, but acknowledged that Jamaat-e-Islami has run campaigns against electricity theft. The petitioner’s counsel argued that various surcharges and taxes, including the Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA), are being imposed through electricity bills, placing an additional burden on consumers.

The counsel further emphasized that their petition specifically challenges certain surcharges and the FAD, upon which the court decided to hear the case along with the ongoing IPPs case for a comprehensive review.

After a brief hearing the Court accepted the plea and clubbed the plea with Independent Power Producers (IPPs) case to adjudicate the matter.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner – Mohla & Mohla – Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Pakistan. A Satirist and Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

SC Upholds Charitable Status for Ethical Trade But Mandates Strict Proof of Application for Tax Exemption

ISLAMABAD – A recent Supreme Court ruling has provided essential clarity on the income tax…

SC Affirms Post Arrest Bail Standard: ‘Further Inquiry’ is Prerequisite for Liberty; Gravity of Offence Insufficient for Rejection

ISLAMABAD – While reinforcing fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has accepted post-arrest…

Lahore High Court, Justice Abher Gul Khan, Sajjad Ali acquittal, murder conviction overturned, reasonable doubt, flawed investigation, evidentiary failures, delayed FIR, post-mortem delay, withholding witnesses, unsubstantiated motive, unreliable testimony, forensic gaps, Khudayar Mohla

LHC Acquits Murder Convict as Prosecution Failed to Prove the Story

LAHORE – A single-member bench of the Lahore High Court comprising Justice Abher Gul Khan,…