Categories Courts

Appointment of Dr Attaur Rahman, others in HEC challenged

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday issued notices to the federal government in response to a plea challenging the appointment of four Higher Education Commission (HEC) members including Dr Attaur Rahman.

Appearing before a single-member bench of Justice Aamer Farooq in the matter, Advocate High Court Umer Gilani contended that four members of the HEC including Dr Attaur Rehman, Dr Akram Shaikh, Nadira Panjwani and Dr Arif Nazeer Butt were holding the office in result of a mala fide exercise of authority and without due process of law.

An eminent academic and activist Dr AH Nayyar and three others have filed the petition, who earlier invoked the jurisdiction of the IHC and secured restoration of the deposed chairman of the HEC Dr Tariq Banuri.

The petitioners alleged that federation was exercising its power illegally since restoration of Dr Tariq Banuri saying on February 07, 2022, an illegal resolution was passed through mere email circulation as a result of which the office of the restored Chairperson was made practically dysfunctional.

Advocate Gilani argued that under provisions of the HEC Ordinance it is mandatory to deliberate upon  any meeting/ resolution saying the mandatory provisions of the HEC Ordinance have been violated and resulted to file the petition in hand.

The petitioners claimed that illegal actions were being taken in order to defeat the efforts made by Dr Tariq Banuri to carry out a performance audit of HEJ, the publicly funded institution headed by Dr Attaur Rehman. The petitioner has also challenged the appointment of Dr. Attaur Rehman, Dr. Akram Shaikh, NADRA Panjwani and Dr. Arif Butta.

They have alleged that these appointments were made without any competitive or transparent manner and with the object of packing the Commission with loyalists.

After hearing preliminary arguments in the matter, Justice Aamir Farooq issued notices to the federal government, HEC and other respondents with directives to file comments before the next date of hearing. Later, hearing of the matter was adjourned till March 28. 

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Rawalpindi Anti-Narcotics Court, second Anti-Narcotics Court Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force court Rawalpindi, drug cases backlog Rawalpindi, 500 pending narcotics cases, special anti-narcotics courts Punjab, Rawalpindi division judiciary, speedy disposal narcotics cases, Punjab government anti-drug measures, Counter Narcotics Force Punjab, drug smuggling crackdown Pakistan, narcotics cases Pakistan, Additional District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force, Punjab Government, drug control courts Pakistan, special courts Pakistan, narcotics trial courts, criminal justice system Punjab, rising drug cases Rawalpindi, law and order Punjab, judiciary expansion Rawalpindi, anti-drug campaign Pakistan, court reforms Punjab, narcotics prosecution Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla.

Punjab Govt Approves Second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi Division

RAWALPINDI: Approval has been granted for the establishment of a second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi. The…

Climate Justice: UN Urged to Codify ICJ Obligations in New Global Resolution

Governments must not squander the opportunity to turn the International Court of Justice’s 2025 Advisory…

LHC Sets Aside PRA Decision Levying Multi-Million-Rupee Sales Tax on FWE-II

RAWALPINDI: While authoring the 16-page verdict in a matter relating to a multi-million-rupee sales tax…