Categories Courts

Appointment of Dr Attaur Rahman, others in HEC challenged

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday issued notices to the federal government in response to a plea challenging the appointment of four Higher Education Commission (HEC) members including Dr Attaur Rahman.

Appearing before a single-member bench of Justice Aamer Farooq in the matter, Advocate High Court Umer Gilani contended that four members of the HEC including Dr Attaur Rehman, Dr Akram Shaikh, Nadira Panjwani and Dr Arif Nazeer Butt were holding the office in result of a mala fide exercise of authority and without due process of law.

An eminent academic and activist Dr AH Nayyar and three others have filed the petition, who earlier invoked the jurisdiction of the IHC and secured restoration of the deposed chairman of the HEC Dr Tariq Banuri.

The petitioners alleged that federation was exercising its power illegally since restoration of Dr Tariq Banuri saying on February 07, 2022, an illegal resolution was passed through mere email circulation as a result of which the office of the restored Chairperson was made practically dysfunctional.

Advocate Gilani argued that under provisions of the HEC Ordinance it is mandatory to deliberate upon  any meeting/ resolution saying the mandatory provisions of the HEC Ordinance have been violated and resulted to file the petition in hand.

The petitioners claimed that illegal actions were being taken in order to defeat the efforts made by Dr Tariq Banuri to carry out a performance audit of HEJ, the publicly funded institution headed by Dr Attaur Rehman. The petitioner has also challenged the appointment of Dr. Attaur Rehman, Dr. Akram Shaikh, NADRA Panjwani and Dr. Arif Butta.

They have alleged that these appointments were made without any competitive or transparent manner and with the object of packing the Commission with loyalists.

After hearing preliminary arguments in the matter, Justice Aamir Farooq issued notices to the federal government, HEC and other respondents with directives to file comments before the next date of hearing. Later, hearing of the matter was adjourned till March 28. 

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…