Categories Courts

BHC bars SSGCL in collecting extra charges from consumers

The Balochistan High Court Monday restrained Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL) from collecting extra charges from gas consumers in the province.

A division bench of the Balochistan High Court (BHC) comprising Justices Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Sardar Ahmed Haleemi issued the directives, expressing dissatisfaction over non-appearance of secretary energy, chairman and director general (Gas) Ogra and 25 top brass of Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL).
Earlier the bench has asked them to appear before the court in response to a pending plea seeking directives over uninterrupted gas supply, manhandling the applicants and failure to establish consumers grievance redressal mechanism since a long.
During the hearing of the case, the court was informed that the secretary petroleum, DG gas and other relevant authorities were not present in the court despite being summoned. The court expressed its displeasure over their non-appearance and summoned them for the next hearing.
Earlier, the BHC has issued contempt of court notices to secretary energy, chairman and director general (Gas) Ogra and 25 top brass of Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL) for willful defiance of court directives over uninterrupted gas supply, manhandling the applicants and failure to establish consumers grievance redressal mechanism since a long.
The petitioner has urged the court’s directives to National Highways Authority (NHA), Cantonment Board Quetta (CBQ) and Metropolitan Corporation Quetta (MCQ) to ensure immediate filling up patches and trenches followed by blacktopping soon after handing over the site by the SSGC’s contractor.
Issuing notice in the matter the bench said in its order (Copy available with TLTP), “We are dismay to painfully observe, which is unfortunate at least to say, that time and again the orders were passed, but no heed was paid, which left us with no other option, but to issue contempt of court notices to all concerned officers of the SSGC, Ministry of Petroleum, Oil & Gas Development Authority with clear understanding that why a contempt of court proceeding shall not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the court’s orders”.
Expressing grave dismay over referral of domestic consumer bills correction to Karachi office during the last hearing of the case, the bench issued directives to people at the helm of affairs to ensure that such issues should be decided in SSGCL Quetta.
On Monday, the court stopped the SSGCL from collecting extra charges from consumers and adjourned the hearing of the case till June 19, 2023.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…