Categories Courts

CCP Imposes Rs1 Billion in Penalties on Cartels and Deceptive Advertisers

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) issued 12 major orders during FY 2024-25, imposing penalties worth Rs1.007 billion on businesses involved in anti-competitive practices across key sectors including fertilizers, poultry, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, real estate, food, hygiene products, paints, and education.

The Commission has strengthened its enforcement arm and streamlined hearings by curbing unnecessary delays. This fast-track approach is helping CCP resolve cases swiftly and enforce the law more effectively. Out of the 12 orders issued, eight were related to deceptive marketing. Three orders involved cartelization and price fixing. One order was issued on the direction of the Lahore High Court to address the issue of CCP’s jurisdiction in a case involving the deceptive and fraudulent use of a trademark under Section 10(2) of the Competition Act.CCP, Competition Commission of Pakistan, cartel penalties, deceptive advertising, urea price fixing, poultry cartel, false advertising, misleading marketing, Section 10(2) Competition Act, FMPAC, fertilizer cartel, Kingdom Valley fine, Unilever Lifebuoy, Friesland Campina Engro, Hyundai Tucson ad, Al-Ghazi Tractors fuel claims, 3N Lifemed fake certification, Diamond Paints ad fine, British Lyceum ad penalty, anti-competitive practices, cartel crackdown, CCP enforcement, CAT Pakistan, consumer protection Pakistan, fair market competition, Dr. Kabir Sidhu CCP

In a landmark case, CCP fined six urea manufacturers and their trade group—Fertilizer Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC)—a total of Rs375 million for price-fixing. Each company was fined Rs50 million; the association was fined Rs75 million. Another major penalty of Rs155 million was slapped on eight poultry hatcheries for fixing prices of day-old broiler chicks. In deceptive marketing cases, Kingdom Valley was fined Rs150 million for false claims about its housing project. Unilever and Friesland Campina Engro were fined Rs75 million each for marketing frozen desserts as ice cream. Unilever also faced an additional Rs60 million penalty for deceptive ads for Lifebuoy products.  Al-Ghazi Tractors was fined Rs40 million for false fuel efficiency claims. Hyundai Nishat Motors received a Rs25 million fine for misleading ads about the Hyundai Tucson SUV. 3N Lifemed Pharmaceuticals was fined Rs20 million for using fake certification for dialysis machines.

The fine was later reduced to Rs2 million by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT). British Lyceum and Diamond Paints were fined Rs5 million each for publishing misleading advertisements.

Al-Ghazi Tractors was fined Rs40 million for false fuel efficiency claims. Hyundai Nishat Motors received a Rs25 million fine for misleading ads about the Hyundai Tucson SUV. 3N Lifemed Pharmaceuticals was fined Rs20 million for using fake certification for dialysis machines.

“Cartelization is a serious offence and will not be tolerated,” warned CCP Chairman Dr. Kabir Sidhu. “Cartels harm economic growth, violate consumer rights, and deter new investment,” he said. He further emphasized that association platforms must not be used for price collusion or to facilitate market abuse, which leads to the exploitation of the entire nation.

Author

Amna Anwar, Lidia, LLB, IIUI, Islamabad, Advocate Amna Anwar, Editor

The writer is an LLB student and contributes to Law Today. Can be contacted at amnaanwar@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…