Categories Courts

Court Decrees Rs71 Lacs Against DILOYO (Pvt.) Ltd. Cafe

Awarding seven million rupees compensation to an aggrieved party as remedy over breach of contract, the court of Civil Judge Islamabad Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhry Thursday decreed a suit against DILOYO (Private Limited) – a chain of cafes owned by Qamar Abbas.

The Court of Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhary has relied on Section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872 which stipulates that compensation is liable to be paid for breach of contract.  The Court issued directives to the cafe and its owner to pay Muhammad Ishtiaq Aslam Malik sum of seventy-one lacs as compensation for the investment he made in this business venture.

The Court also directed a payment of 8% interest from the date of the decision of the suit until its realization. This judgment represents a significant victory for investors who have been defrauded of their money by business partners.The background facts of the case are that in late November 2023 one Qamar Abbas, a person hailing from Quetta who purported to be an entrepreneurial genius lured Ishtiaq, a pensioner, into investing his life-time savings in a cafe called “BREE”.

By the standards of Pakistani civil justice, obtaining a civil suit  decreed in one year time is something of a record – I am quite satisfied with the outcome, and I think today’s judgment gives hope to Pakistani investors who have been defrauded of their savings by clever fraudsters posing as business partners – my client’s stance has not only been vindicated publicly, but also, I am hopeful that his loss will soon be recovered”, says  counsel for the Investor Osama Yousaf.

Qamar Abbas claimed that this was a successful of upcoming chain of cafes and promised to use the investment to setup a new branch of the cafe. He further promised that not only would the investor be able to get a share of the revenue, he would also have ownership rights over the new branch. Qamar gave written projections, promising that the worth of the project would be doubled within a handful of years, if not more. Relying upon these promises,  Ishtiaq invested millions of rupees in the project.

Soon after receiving the investment, Qamar Abbas started creating imaginary quarrels with the investor and a few months down the road, on 15th January 2024, sent the investor a termination letter. He sought to oust the investor without returning his capital.

The investor, left with no other remedy, filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and damages. After recording evidence, the Civil Court decreed the case in favor of the investor in its eight page long judgment, spanning over nineteen paragraphs.

The Court of Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhary relied on Section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872 which stipulates that compensation is liable to be paid for breach of contract. The Court also relied upon a ruling of the Supreme Court in Habib Bank versus Mahboob Rabbani 2023 SCMR 1189. Besides granting contractual damages, the Court also granted general damages worth one million to the investor on account of the mental anguish he suffered. The Court also granted him one million on account of lost opportunity to invest in alternative ventures, and one lac rupees by way of litigation costs.

Advocate Osama Yousaf from Law and Policy Chamber represented the investor before Court in the matter . While contacted he responded saying,  “By the standards of Pakistani civil justice, obtaining a civil suit  decreed in one year time is something of a record – I am quite satisfied with the outcome, and I think today’s judgment gives hope to Pakistani investors who have been defrauded of their savings by clever fraudsters posing as business partners – my client’s stance has not only been vindicated publicly, but also, I am hopeful that his loss will soon be recovered.”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…