Categories Courts

Court Decrees Rs71 Lacs Against DILOYO (Pvt.) Ltd. Cafe

Awarding seven million rupees compensation to an aggrieved party as remedy over breach of contract, the court of Civil Judge Islamabad Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhry Thursday decreed a suit against DILOYO (Private Limited) – a chain of cafes owned by Qamar Abbas.

The Court of Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhary has relied on Section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872 which stipulates that compensation is liable to be paid for breach of contract.  The Court issued directives to the cafe and its owner to pay Muhammad Ishtiaq Aslam Malik sum of seventy-one lacs as compensation for the investment he made in this business venture.

The Court also directed a payment of 8% interest from the date of the decision of the suit until its realization. This judgment represents a significant victory for investors who have been defrauded of their money by business partners.The background facts of the case are that in late November 2023 one Qamar Abbas, a person hailing from Quetta who purported to be an entrepreneurial genius lured Ishtiaq, a pensioner, into investing his life-time savings in a cafe called “BREE”.

By the standards of Pakistani civil justice, obtaining a civil suit  decreed in one year time is something of a record – I am quite satisfied with the outcome, and I think today’s judgment gives hope to Pakistani investors who have been defrauded of their savings by clever fraudsters posing as business partners – my client’s stance has not only been vindicated publicly, but also, I am hopeful that his loss will soon be recovered”, says  counsel for the Investor Osama Yousaf.

Qamar Abbas claimed that this was a successful of upcoming chain of cafes and promised to use the investment to setup a new branch of the cafe. He further promised that not only would the investor be able to get a share of the revenue, he would also have ownership rights over the new branch. Qamar gave written projections, promising that the worth of the project would be doubled within a handful of years, if not more. Relying upon these promises,  Ishtiaq invested millions of rupees in the project.

Soon after receiving the investment, Qamar Abbas started creating imaginary quarrels with the investor and a few months down the road, on 15th January 2024, sent the investor a termination letter. He sought to oust the investor without returning his capital.

The investor, left with no other remedy, filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and damages. After recording evidence, the Civil Court decreed the case in favor of the investor in its eight page long judgment, spanning over nineteen paragraphs.

The Court of Ms Ambreen Iqbal Chaudhary relied on Section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872 which stipulates that compensation is liable to be paid for breach of contract. The Court also relied upon a ruling of the Supreme Court in Habib Bank versus Mahboob Rabbani 2023 SCMR 1189. Besides granting contractual damages, the Court also granted general damages worth one million to the investor on account of the mental anguish he suffered. The Court also granted him one million on account of lost opportunity to invest in alternative ventures, and one lac rupees by way of litigation costs.

Advocate Osama Yousaf from Law and Policy Chamber represented the investor before Court in the matter . While contacted he responded saying,  “By the standards of Pakistani civil justice, obtaining a civil suit  decreed in one year time is something of a record – I am quite satisfied with the outcome, and I think today’s judgment gives hope to Pakistani investors who have been defrauded of their savings by clever fraudsters posing as business partners – my client’s stance has not only been vindicated publicly, but also, I am hopeful that his loss will soon be recovered.”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner – Mohla & Mohla – Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Pakistan. A Satirist and Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi, OGDCL pension case, appellate jurisdiction, additional pension directive, constitutional right to pension, Articles 9 and 14, fundamental rights, retired employee, Islamabad High Court judgment set aside, compliance warning, judicial intervention, deferred wages, employee entitlements, dignity and livelihood, constitutional justice, corporate accountability

SC Terms Pension a Constitutional Right – Directs OGDCL to Immediately Pay Petitioner Arrears

ISLAMABAD – While exercising appellate jurisdiction, a two-member bench of the top court comprising Justice…

legal battle, stay order, PHA Officers Residencia, Islamabad, Civil Court, green spaces, housing plots, CDA, PHA-F, Barrister Umer Ijaz Gilani, urban conservation, layout plan, illegal plots, rainwater drainage, urban flooding, citizens' rights, legal victory, Civil Judge Malik Aman, public hearing, Pakistan

Court Halts PHA’s Plan to Convert Green Spaces For Residential Plots

ISLAMABAD – In a significant development for urban conservation, residents of PHA Officers Residencia have…

IHC Seeks Islamabad Chief Commissioner Response over Unfilled Posts

ISLAMABAD – The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Monday sought clarification from Chief Commissioner of the…