Categories Op-Ed Rafia Zakaria 

Cruelty in Marriage

women rights in Pakistan, cruelty in marriage, justice Ayesha Malik, supreme court of Pakistan judgement, dissolution of marriage, khula without consent, dissolution of Muslim marriages act 1939, domestic abuse in Pakistan, verbal and emotional abuse, second marriage without consent, family court Peshawar, Peshawar high court, women legal rights, Pakistan legal system, women empowerment, gender justice, women protection laws, marital cruelty definition, mental cruelty, physical abuse, emotional neglect, judicial reform, women dignity, nikahnama rights, dower rights, landmark supreme court ruling, women legal safeguards, justice for abused women, marital rights Pakistan, family law reform, hope for Pakistani women
 Rafia Zakaria

OFTEN decades pass without any improvement in the status of women in Pakistan. Women in public roles — from social media influencers to politicians – are killed but no one is held responsible. And while ostensibly pro-women laws are passed, there is no enforcement — accusers who wrongfully allege adultery or men who beat their wives literally get away with murder. For many women, death is likely a respite from the abuse, strictures and thankless toil Pakistani society has heaped upon them.

But there are days when hope arises. Last week, the detailed judgement by the Supreme Court’s Justice Ayesha Malik presented just such a remarkable moment. In a 17-page decision, Justice Malik made some landmark rulings, notably that cruelty in marriage, which can be grounds for dissolution, includes factors apart from physical abuse. Second, that a second marriage without a wife’s consent is grounds for dissolution as well.

The story begins in Peshawar, where a woman initially filed a case in the family court. After her rukhsati in 2016, the petitioner shifted to her husband’s house, where according to her, her husband and his family were regularly verbally and emotionally abusive towards her. She was slapped and bruised, but the family ignored it. Male domestic staff had access to her living quarters and she was also thrown before her husband’s pet dogs, which added to her fear. Even when the couple moved to their own place, the husband remained out with his friends until two or three in the morning. The wife said she often did not have enough food to eat and at one time had to have the police called so that she could leave. For his part, the respondent (the husband) insisted that the wife was only interested in her career and not in being a wife.

The husband took a second wife, after which the woman filed a suit for dissolution of the marriage in the family court. The abused wife had to leave the marital home. It was found that the family court did not assess the evidence as it should have. When people said that they had seen the physical injuries on the wife, it was ruled that they could not be believed because they had not been physically present during the beating. In her decision, Justice Malik bravely notes how the lower courts failed to accord proper weight to the wife’s statements in ‘determining’ that no abuse had taken place. Even worse, the Peshawar High Court, upheld this finding. Instead of dissolution, a khula was granted, “without her consent”. The family court initially wanted her to forfeit her dower – a plot of land, 30 tolas of gold and Rs500,000.

A landmark judgement provides a glimmer of hope for women.

In her landmark decision, Justice Malik noted first that a court cannot grant a khula without the wife’s consent. She indicates that the family court had erred by not dissolving the marriage and granting khula instead. She notes that “cruelty” which is the statutory requirement in the relevant law (Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939) means not only physical violence but also “encompasses physical harm; such as slaps, beatings or assault, as well as mental cruelty, such as humiliation, verbal abuse, or unfounded allegations of unfaithfulness in a marriage; emotional cruelty, such as neglect or indifference; and, at times, the broader environment of the marriage, such as hostility in the home or oppressive behaviour by in-laws tolerated or encouraged by the husband”. Justice Malik recognises that in this case, cruelty, taking a second wife without permission and nonpayment of maintenance all constitute grounds for dissolution under the DMMA. The decision clarifies that if a husband does not obtain his wife’s consent for a second marriage he must petition the Union Council, which would then convene an Arbitration Council. It stands to reason that without this process, a second marriage would violate the law.

This judgement will hopefully make it easier for abused Pakistani women to obtain a dissolution, without forfeiting their rights to dower. In this case, the wife’s knowledge and bravery in not only knowing her rights but also in persisting in trying to get them are to be highly commended. Because of her and this ground-breaking decision, millions of women in Pakistan can stop being forced to accept khula when they are owed a dissolution due to their husband’s cruelty, neglect or second marriage. As the wedding season starts, all women and their relatives must emphasise the need to pay attention to the rights and clauses in nikahnamas, which are their legal and religious safeguards against abusive spouses.

——–

Rafia Zakaria- The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy. rafia.zakaria@gmail.com

Author

Avatar photo

Making law simple, clear, and useful for everyone.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Artificial intelligence, AI and human civilization, AI reshaping society, future of AI, AI and employment, AI replacing jobs, AI and culture, AI ethics, AI and human intelligence, machine learning impact, AI and education, AI technology advancement, AI and creativity, AI domination, superintelligent AI, AI and mental health, AI risks and benefits, automation and unemployment, AI and governance, AI and decision making, AI and social media, AI manipulation, human vs machine, AI and fine arts, AI and literature, AI controlled systems, AI policy, AI and economic inequality, future of work, AI and banking, AI and healthcare, AI existential threat, Nick Bostrom AI, Kai-Fu Lee AI, AI and skilled workers, AI and unskilled labor, AI and job transition, responsible AI, AI and spirituality, AI and quantum physics, AI governance, AI and youth, ethical AI development, AI Pandora's Box, AI friend or foe, AI and human creativity, AI and global challenges, AI and climate change, AI and manufacturing, AI and logistics

Minds We Made: How AI Is Reshaping Work, Culture, Ethics, And Human Intelligence

Besides other grave issues such as climate change, global warming, nuclear proliferation and scarcity of…

Shanza Shadab,Millennials vs Gen Z intelligence, Plato’s Cave digital metaphor, Gen Z attention span, Flynn Effect decline, digital literacy vs deep focus, algorithmic bias critical thinking, cognitive evolution, social media impact on learning, modern mind erosion, information processing speed.

Millennials vs. GenZ: Evolution or Erosion of the Modern Mind? From Plato’s cave to Instagram reels – the real truth behind GenZ’s intelligence

Whether today’s youth really becoming less intelligent than previous generations? Why do many teachers say…

Digital Pakistan 2026, Data Protection Bill, National AI Policy Pakistan, Privacy Rights Pakistan, Cyber Security Law, Khudayar Mohla Advocate, Freelancers Pakistan, PECA Law, Data Adequacy, 5G Pakistan, Biometric Security, Digital Trade Pakistan, IT Exports.

The Data We Don’t Own

It’s 2026, and if you listen to the digital discourse in Islamabad or Karachi, you…