Categories Courts

Dua Zahra gets option to live with parents or husband

The Sindh High Court (SHC) Wednesday allowed teenager Dua Zahra – who had mysteriously gone missing from Karachi in April but later declared that she had run away from her home to marry 21-year-old Zaheer Ahmed – to decide where she wants to go, with her parents or husband.

In a three-page written order, Justice Junaid Ghaffar said the court reached the verdict in line with the testimonies. “In light of all the evidence, this is not a case of kidnapping.” “…the alleged/minor Dua e Zahra Kazmi, pursuant to her statement on Oath and Age Certificate is set at liberty to decide as to whom she intends to reside and go along,” the order read. In the order, the court also said that it has decided to dispose of Zahra’s father’s – Mehdi Ali Kazmi – petition for her recovery as the case of his daughter was not of kidnapping.

For the production of Dua before the Lahore High Court later this week, the SHC said the Sindh Police is at liberty to produce her if required. But the judge said that “we, after production and statement of the alleged abductee Dua, are not inclined to issue any further directions to that effect.” During the hearing earlier in the day, the high court had allowed the parents to meet their daughter for 10 minutes, after reserving its decision on the teenager’s recovery plea. Besides the parents, the girl’s maternal aunt was also part of the meeting that took place in the court chambers.

However, after the meeting, the girl’s father, Mehdi Ali Kazmi, reached up to the judge’s rostrum and claimed that the girl in the private meeting had said that she wanted to go home. The court questioned his statements and maintained that Dua Zehra had signed an affidavit before the court saying that she did not want to go with her parents.

“Despite the affidavit, you are asking us to issue another order,” the court remarked. Dua Zehra’s father reiterated his claim, much to the chagrin and disbelief of the high court.

According to sources, the parents’ claim was false. Apparently the parents had kept begging Dua to go home with them but she sat quiet, and did not even look at her parents. They further cited the girl’s refusal to converse with her parents as a reason for the meeting to end before a full 10 minutes.

Talking to the media following the hearing, Mehdi Kazmi stated that the medical report ordained by the court which showed his daughter to be of 16-17 years of age was “wrong” and that he had “challenged the medical report”. His counsel contended that the medical report was “based on mala fide” and that they had official documents showing Dua’s real age. He said no medical board was formed to determine Dua’s age and that a “junior doctor made her medical report”.

Talking to the media after the hearing, provincial minister Shehla Raza said when the girl had appeared before the court, there was an order to undergo medical examination to determine her age. “We have objected to the girl’s medical report,” she added. The minister said that the police surgeon was asked for an age certificate, but the certificate does not even have the police surgeon’s signature. Shehla added that the signature on medical certificate is not of Dua Zehra, it is someone else’s. “The teeth have been declared to be of a minor in the certificate,” the minister claimed. “I have met the girl. She cannot go alone,” Shehla said, adding that the girl had at the last hearing said that she did not want to go with her parents. However, she added that Dua did say that she wanted to go with them. “But was not allowed to go,” the minister claimed.

In a separate petition, the Lahore High Court (LHC) raised objection on a petition of Dua Zehra’s father regarding a harassment petition filed by the girl’s mother-in-law. The father of Dua Zehra – a teen who was allegedly kidnapped and married – had filed a petition in the high court requesting it to reject the mother-in-law’s petition. The petition maintained that Dua Zehra had been presented before the Sindh High Court (SHC), therefore the petition filed in the LHC had become inactive and that there was no justification in presenting Dua before the LHC. The petitioner requested the court to reject the mother-in-law’s pending petition. Dua Zehra’s mother-in-law, Noor Bibi’s, request regarding harassment by the police is currently under hearing.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, CJP Yahya Afridi, women’s rights in Pakistan, judiciary commitment to women rights, gender responsive justice Pakistan, International Women’s Day Pakistan judiciary, Supreme Court of Pakistan women rights, access to justice for women Pakistan, gender sensitive judiciary Pakistan, National Judicial Policy Making Committee NJPMC, NJPMC gender responsive justice agenda, judicial reforms Pakistan 2026–27, women facilitation centers courts Pakistan, legal aid for women Pakistan, women legal advisory helpline Pakistan, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan reforms, family law reforms Pakistan, mediation and family support services courts Pakistan, gender fair language in justice system, legal awareness for women Pakistan, rural women legal rights Pakistan, women empowerment through justice system, Pakistan judiciary reforms for women, rule of law and women protection Pakistan, Islamabad Supreme Court, Khudayar Mohla, justice for women justice for Pakistan

Justice for Women is Justice for Pakistan, says CJP Afridi

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi has reaffirmed the judiciary’s commitment to protecting…

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…