Categories Courts

Dua Zahra gets option to live with parents or husband

The Sindh High Court (SHC) Wednesday allowed teenager Dua Zahra – who had mysteriously gone missing from Karachi in April but later declared that she had run away from her home to marry 21-year-old Zaheer Ahmed – to decide where she wants to go, with her parents or husband.

In a three-page written order, Justice Junaid Ghaffar said the court reached the verdict in line with the testimonies. “In light of all the evidence, this is not a case of kidnapping.” “…the alleged/minor Dua e Zahra Kazmi, pursuant to her statement on Oath and Age Certificate is set at liberty to decide as to whom she intends to reside and go along,” the order read. In the order, the court also said that it has decided to dispose of Zahra’s father’s – Mehdi Ali Kazmi – petition for her recovery as the case of his daughter was not of kidnapping.

For the production of Dua before the Lahore High Court later this week, the SHC said the Sindh Police is at liberty to produce her if required. But the judge said that “we, after production and statement of the alleged abductee Dua, are not inclined to issue any further directions to that effect.” During the hearing earlier in the day, the high court had allowed the parents to meet their daughter for 10 minutes, after reserving its decision on the teenager’s recovery plea. Besides the parents, the girl’s maternal aunt was also part of the meeting that took place in the court chambers.

However, after the meeting, the girl’s father, Mehdi Ali Kazmi, reached up to the judge’s rostrum and claimed that the girl in the private meeting had said that she wanted to go home. The court questioned his statements and maintained that Dua Zehra had signed an affidavit before the court saying that she did not want to go with her parents.

“Despite the affidavit, you are asking us to issue another order,” the court remarked. Dua Zehra’s father reiterated his claim, much to the chagrin and disbelief of the high court.

According to sources, the parents’ claim was false. Apparently the parents had kept begging Dua to go home with them but she sat quiet, and did not even look at her parents. They further cited the girl’s refusal to converse with her parents as a reason for the meeting to end before a full 10 minutes.

Talking to the media following the hearing, Mehdi Kazmi stated that the medical report ordained by the court which showed his daughter to be of 16-17 years of age was “wrong” and that he had “challenged the medical report”. His counsel contended that the medical report was “based on mala fide” and that they had official documents showing Dua’s real age. He said no medical board was formed to determine Dua’s age and that a “junior doctor made her medical report”.

Talking to the media after the hearing, provincial minister Shehla Raza said when the girl had appeared before the court, there was an order to undergo medical examination to determine her age. “We have objected to the girl’s medical report,” she added. The minister said that the police surgeon was asked for an age certificate, but the certificate does not even have the police surgeon’s signature. Shehla added that the signature on medical certificate is not of Dua Zehra, it is someone else’s. “The teeth have been declared to be of a minor in the certificate,” the minister claimed. “I have met the girl. She cannot go alone,” Shehla said, adding that the girl had at the last hearing said that she did not want to go with her parents. However, she added that Dua did say that she wanted to go with them. “But was not allowed to go,” the minister claimed.

In a separate petition, the Lahore High Court (LHC) raised objection on a petition of Dua Zehra’s father regarding a harassment petition filed by the girl’s mother-in-law. The father of Dua Zehra – a teen who was allegedly kidnapped and married – had filed a petition in the high court requesting it to reject the mother-in-law’s petition. The petition maintained that Dua Zehra had been presented before the Sindh High Court (SHC), therefore the petition filed in the LHC had become inactive and that there was no justification in presenting Dua before the LHC. The petitioner requested the court to reject the mother-in-law’s pending petition. Dua Zehra’s mother-in-law, Noor Bibi’s, request regarding harassment by the police is currently under hearing.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Imran Khan defamation case, Rs10 billion defamation suit, Shehbaz Sharif defamation case, Supreme Court Pakistan, SC bench defamation, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, PTI founder defamation, Lahore High Court order, Punjab government impleaded, Defamation Ordinance 2002, review petition Supreme Court, right of defence closed, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Panama Papers bribe allegation, defamation cases six months, SC defamation appeals, trial court Lahore, Justice Ayesha Malik bench, defamation proceedings stayed, PTI legal battle

Defamation Cases Must Be Decided Within Six Months, Says SC Judge

ISLAMABAD: While hearing set of appeals relating to defamation matter on Tuesday top court Justice…

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, judicial reforms Pakistan, Supreme Court reform session, Reform Action Plan RAP, death penalty cases reduction, case pendency Supreme Court, court digitization Pakistan, e-courts Pakistan, Federal Ombudsman Naveed Kamran Baloch, Law and Justice Commission Pakistan, Federal Judicial Academy, alternative dispute resolution Pakistan, case management Supreme Court, KPIs judiciary Pakistan, e-payment court fees, Public Facilitation Centre Supreme Court, barcoding file tracking, death sentence appeals Pakistan, SC case disposal rate, transparency justice system Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

All Remaining Death Sentence Appeals to Be Fixed for Hearing Within 30 Days: SC

ISLAMABAD : Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Yahya Afridi on Tuesday chaired the tenth interactive…

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…