Categories Courts

ICJ Sets to Hear Arguments on States’ Climate Change Obligation

A day ago International Court of Justice announced to conduct public hearings on December 2, 2024 relating to its advisory opinion on states’ obligations regarding climate change.

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted by consensus a 2023 resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on states’ climate change obligations. The UNGA sought answers to two questions: (1) under international law, what are the climate change obligations that states have, and (2) what are the legal consequences if a state causes environmental damage, harming both vulnerable small island developing states and present and future generations?

The UNGA asked the ICJ to consider environmental obligations under various international legal instruments such as the UN Charter, the Paris Agreement, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By including human rights instruments in its question, the UNGA signaled recognition that climate change obligations are a possible human rights issue.

This is the third climate change-related advisory opinion brought to international courts in the past year and builds on fresh international developments. Earlier this year, in May, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea provided an opinion that defined greenhouse gas emissions as a form of marine pollution and advised that states must “take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from greenhouse gas emissions.” Also in May, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights began hearings on whether Latin American states have human rights obligations to manage climate change, with a decision expected by the end of 2024.

This oral hearing announcement follows the year-long written submission process, during which the ICJ received the most submissions it has ever received for an advisory opinion, 91 written submissions, and 62 rebuttals. The volume and interest in this advisory opinion highlight its potential landmark impact on international climate change obligations. The ICJ decides whether and when to release the 91 written submissions. If it chooses to do so, the submissions will be made available after December 2, 2024, when oral proceedings begin.

ICJ advisory opinions are legally non-binding on UN member states; however, they are authoritative legal documents. How this advisory opinion came about supports member states abiding by the opinion because the resolution was adopted by consensus, meaning all member states agreed on it. This adds significant weight to the opinion and will act as a powerful moral suasion once released.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…