Categories Courts

IHC drops the gavel: Takes action against ICT managers

While announcing reserved verdict in a matter relating to contempt proceedings against officials including Irfan Nawaz Memon Deputy Commissioner and Senior Superintendent Police of Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) Jameel Zafar on Friday Islamabad High Court awarded them jail sentence for months.

However, the single-member bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) comprising Justice Babar Sattar suspended the jail sentence of the Deputy Commissioner (DC) ICT, saying he is being given opportunity to file an appeal against the court verdict. “The DC will be arrested if his sentence was not suspended by filing an appeal in three days,” the Judge observed.

Justice Babar Sattar announced reserved verdict and sentenced DC Irfan Nawaz Memon, Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Operations Jameel Zafar and Station House Officer (SHO) Naseer Manzoor of Kohsar Police Station. The IHC handed down the sentence to the officers for issuing orders for detention of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders Shehryar Afridi and Shandana Gulzar under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) ordinance even after the court has issued restraining order in the matter. In September last year, the IHC had restrained the DC from issuing Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) for an indefinite period as Justice Babar Sattar had ruled that the Islamabad DC cannot use the powers of Section 3 of MPO for an indefinite period.

According to media, the Islamabad DC has been sentenced to six months in jail, SSP four months in prison and SHO of Kohsar Police Station two months whereas the court imposed a fine of Rs100,000 on the three officials each.  It is worth mention that on February 20, the IHC had issued arrest warrants for Islamabad deputy commissioner in the contempt case initiated over prolonged detention of PTI leaders Shehryar Afridi and Shandana Gulzar under the MPO ordinance.  The high court had ordered IGPs of all the four provinces and Islamabad to arrest the DC wherever they find him and produced before it in the case.

Around six months ago, DC Irfan Nawaz Memon and three others had been indicted in the contempt case. Justice Babar Sattar had indicted SSP operations Jamil Zafar, Superintendent (SP) Farooq Buttar and SHO Nasir Manzoor while presiding over the hearing of the case. The IHC judge indicted the officials after rejecting their unconditional apology in the case, saying all four will face contempt proceedings.

Earlier, the high court had ordered immediate relate of PTI leaders Shehryar Afridi and Shandana Gulzar after suspending a detention order. He had also ordered that the DC Irfan Nawaz Memon and police officers would be indicted for contempt of court over abuse of authority. Afridi and Gulzar were detained by the Islamabad Police under the MPO Ordinance for their alleged involvement in the May 9 violence, which was triggered following the arrest of the PTI Chairman Imran Khan in a corruption case earlier this year. Afridi has been in police custody since May 16 as he was arrested by police for multiple times after local courts ordered his release.

Meanwhile, Shandana Gulzar was allegedly arrested by Islamabad police on August 9. Her mother had filed a plea in the IHC against her detention. During the August 16 hearing, Justice Sattar expressed displeasure over repeated arrests of Afridi under 3MPO order and declared it null and void. He said the SSP operations submitted unsatisfactory response, and ordered that contempt of court action will be taken against him and DC Islamabad.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…