Categories Courts

IHC reveals reasons for Imran’s bail, terms Toshakhana II case matter of further inquiry

Issuing a 14-page verdict on Monday, Islamabad High Court recorded reasons behind granting extraordinary relief of post arrest bail to former Prime Minister Imran Khan in Tosha Khana II case, categorically saying the matter is of further inquiry.
A single-member bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) comprising Justice Miangul Aurangzaib stated in the detailed decision that no action can be taken for not depositing the gift of a Bulgarian jewelry set set in the Tosha Khana. The bench added that when action cannot be taken for not depositing the gift, then this is a case for further inquiry.
It has been stated in the verdict that the former prime minister and his wife are accused of not depositing a gift of a Bulgarian jewelry set from the Saudi Crown Prince in the Tosha Khana. It added that prima facie, the non-deposit of gifts in state depository does not entail “appropriate action” under the relevant rules.
The bench said in its verdict in the matter that the petitioner (Imran Khan) is of 72 years of age whereas his wife was granted post arrest bail in the same matter saying, “Bearing in mind the principles of consistency as well as my tentative view that this is the case of further inquiry, post-arrest bail was granted to the petitioner vide short order”
The bench noted that the Cabinet Divisions’ Office Memorandum (OM) dated March 18, 2023 was to have effect from February 22, 2023. It added, “FIA special prosecutor submitted very fairly that the said OM dated 18.03.2023 does not have retrospective effect so as to be made applicable to the case against the petitioner which took place almost two years before the said O.M. was issued.”
The court further noted: “The fact that the OM does not make the non-deposit of the gift with the Toshakhana /Cabinet Division liable to “appropriate action” under “the relevant rules,” this would, in my tentative view, make the case against the petitioner as one of further inquiry.”
It is pertinently mentioned that in November last year, the IHC approved the bail plea of the PTI founder in the new Toshakhana case. The court accepted Khan’s bail plea against two surety bonds worth Rs1 million each.
Imran Khan and the former first lady Bushra Bibi were taken into custody in the case on July 13, 2024, the same day the couple was acquitted in the Iddat case. However, Khan’s wife secured bail in the case from the IHC in October last year.
The bench said in the verdict that Imran Khan is 72 years old and has been in custody for more than four months in this case. The verdict mentioned that after the case was transferred to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the investigating officer did not feel the need to question Imran Khan. Giving another reason to grant post arrest bail to the petitioner, the bench said that the top anti-graft body has filed reference against Imran Khan and documentary evidence of this case is already in the possession of the prosecution so there is no fear of tampering evidence of the case. The bench directed Imran Khan to appear before the trial court for adjudication in the matter saying if the petitioner misuses the concession of the bail, the prosecution can file a petition for cancellation of the bail.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…

Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, FCC Pakistan judgment, tax raid without notice Pakistan, tax authorities raid powers, Justice Aamer Farooq decision, Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Pakistan, FBR enforcement powers, taxpayer raid law Pakistan, tax compliance enforcement Pakistan, super tax Pakistan ruling, Section 4(b) Income Tax Ordinance, Section 4(c) Income Tax Ordinance, Islamabad High Court contempt case, missing persons case Pakistan courts, Shehbaz Sharif contempt case, Aafia Siddiqui case legal developments, PTI cases in courts Pakistan, Article 175E Constitution Pakistan, judiciary independence debate Pakistan, Pakistan constitutional court performance, Khudayar Mohla Advocate

FCC Says Tax Authorities Can Conduct Raids Without Prior Notice

ISLAMABAD: In another legal reprieve for the government, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that tax…

Khudayar Mohla Advocate, Editor Law Today Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC, Tirah Valley, Tirah evacuation, illegal evacuation, unconstitutional evacuation, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, federal government, IDPs, internally displaced persons, Zarak Khan Afridi, Barrister Saud Javed Dawar, Advocate Mohammad Yousaf Orakzai, military operation, Khyber tribal district, relief and rehabilitation, compensation for displaced, safe return, lawful procedure, KP Assembly, Article 232, Pakistani courts, preliminary hearing, displaced population, extreme weather, snow, civilian safety, federal response, provincial response, court directives, Pakistan news, legal proceedings, Peshawar news

PHC Seeks Centre, KPK Response on Tirah Evacuation Plea

PESHAWAR: While issuing notices to federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments on Wednesday in response to …