Categories Courts

IHC Seeks Details From Cabinet Division Over Business For Deaf Person Media Rights

A young pro bono lawyer Shahbaz Shah is committed to make it possible that people at the helm of affair should fulfil their job description in the large interest of public as he has urged the Islamabad High Court directives for private and state-run broadcasters to air news bulletin with sign language interpreters to ensure special persons’ access to the media. Resultantly, Islamabad High Court (IHC) has asked additional secretary Cabinet Division to appear in person to apprise what effort has been made to implement the law in the matter so far.

Advocate High Court Syed Shahbaz Shah has sought implementation of Access to the Media (Deaf) Persons Act, 2022 to protect constitutional fundamental right of deaf persons while invoking jurisdiction of the IHC on behalf of a deaf person Sohail Ahmed. He made Federal Information and Broadcasting Ministry and Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) as respondents.

Shahbaz Shah, Islamabad High Court, Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, Cabinet Division, Access to the Media (Deaf) Persons Act 2022, PEMRA, Federal Government
Pro Bono Lawyer Shahbaz Shah

Appearing on behalf of Pakistan Electronic Media Authority (PEMRA) before single-member bench of the IHC’s Chief Justice Aamer Farooq Friday, advocate Syed Nayyar Abbas Rizvi apprised that a written reply has been submitted. Rizvi further submitted that the PEMRA has written various letters to the electronic media channels, however, is unable to implement the provisions of the Act unless the Board as provided in Section 5 of the Act is formed. He apprised the bench that the PEMRA as well as the Board are to operate hand in glove for the implementation of the provisions of the 2022, Act. The Chief Justice said in the order, “When confronted, learned Deputy Attorney General candidly submitted that representative of the Ministry of Information is present in the Court, however, as per his stance that business under the Access to the Media (Deaf) Persons Act, 2022 has not been allocated to the said Ministry. Again upon the inquiry by the Court, the learned Deputy Attorney General apprised the Court that it is the obligation of the Cabinet Division to allocate business to a particular division”.  After a brief hearing of the matter the bench  said in its order, “In view of referred position, let the Additional Secretary, Cabinet Division, Islamabad appear in person on the next date of hearing to apprise the Court whether allocation has been made till to-date with respect to the business under the Access to the Media (Deaf) Persons Act, 2022”.  The matter would be relisted on October 25.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…