Categories Courts

IHC stays non-engineers employment for engineering slots in PIA

The Islamabad High Court on Monday stayed non-engineering staff employment for engineering slots in the national flag carrier till final adjudication of a plea challenging merit violation in filling vacant posts of engineers.

Earlier on November 08,2021, the court has sought reply from the federal government in response to the plea challenging legality of non-engineering staff employment for engineering slots in Pakistan International Airlines (PIA).

Advocate Umer Gilani has made the federation of Pakistan through the secretary Ministry of Aviation, Pakistan International Airlines Corporation through its chief executive officer and Pakistan Engineering Council through its registrar as respondents on behalf of his client Engr Mian Khuram Ahsan.

Filing a civil miscellaneous application before the court in the matter, Advocate Gilani submitted that earlier on November 8, 2021, after hearing preliminary arguments of the petitioner, the court has issued notices to the respondents and sought specifics comments from PIA within a fortnight.

He apprised the single-member bench of the Justice Aamer Farooq that on the next hearing of the case on December 2, 2021 the court accepted request of the PIA for more time to file comment in the matter. Gilani further submitted that the PIA failed to furnished the reply saying almost a month after the expiry of the court’s deadline, the comments have not been filed by the PIA till date.

Substantiating his application in hand Advocate Gilani informed the bench that while on the one hand the PIA is employing dilatory tactics in court, on the other hand, it has sped up process of appointing and promoting non-engineers to the posts of Chief Engineer and Deputy Chief Engineer. “This is not only a blatant violation of the law and the ruling of the courts, it shows the PIA’s scant regard for the proceedings of this Hon’ble Court”, Gilani argued.

In the main petition, the petitioner’s counsel has contended that the PIA is employing a very large number of non-engineers at the posts of ‘aircraft engineer’, adding that one out of eight chief engineers, 25 out of  53 deputy chief engineers and 334 out 476 aircraft engineers, are non-engineers performing duties with PIA at the moment.

“In stark violation of this law and going against the general principles of merit, the national flag carrier is appointing such persons whose only educational qualification is Matric and who, in many cases started out as “helpers” and “cleaners and eventually rose through the ranks through organisational politics,” Advocate Gilani has told the bench.

After hearing arguments of the lawyer on Monday in the matter, Justice Aamer Farooq of the IHC sought reply from the PIA and held that any appointments made during proceedings will remain subject to the outcome of the case. Hearing of the matter was adjourned till date in office.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…