Categories Courts

IHC suspends CDA special magistrate illegal order as Kulfi vender gets bail

Islamabad High Court on Wednesday granted bail to a Kulfi vendor Farmanullah – sole breadwinner of his seven-member family who was sent behind the bars 15 days ago when an officer of the Capital Development Authority (CDA) exercised powers illegally and awarded him three months rigorous imprisonment and half a million rupee fine. The vendor has been accused for operating cart without required permission in front of Faisal Mosque.

Farmanullah, father of five, including four with special needs, his arrest sparked an outcry over the harsh and extreme nature of punishment meted out to a street vendor. Special Magistrate of the CDA awarded him sentenced under Section 46-A of the CDA Ordinance 1960 and Martial Law Regulation (MLR) No 63.

Appearing before single-member bench of Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri, counsel for the vendor Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani termed arrest and conviction of Farmanullah as sheer violation of constitutional fundamental rights of the accused person. He apprised the court that a Special Magistrate of the CDA who being an employee of the Authority has no formal authority as Judicial Magistrate adding, the official misused his power and awarded imprisonment without framing charge which is also violation of due process of law.

In July 11, officials of the CDA’s Enforcement Directorate arrested Farmanullah for operating his cart in the parking lot of the popular Faisal Mosque alleging he was running business cart without a permission.

TLTP has learnt that some people at the helm of CDA enforcement department have been repeatedly alleged to misuse their formal authority for vested interests but decision makers are avoiding rule of law implementation in true letter and spirit due to reasons best known to them. Spreading of Kitchi Abadis adjacent to Margalla Town, Humak, Rawal Town, Chak Shahzad are manifestation of CDA enforcement negligence which failed to take action against encroachers since a long. Existence of encroachments and illegal constructions in the vicinities worsening law and order  situation. 

Assailing the conviction order before Additional Sessions Judge, Advocate Gilani apprised the court that Farmanullah was convicted within 24 hours of his arrest, without being given the opportunity to seek legal representation. However, the Sessions Court didn’t suspend the sentence. To which the counsels invoked IHC jurisdiction for remedy in the matter.

Advocate Supreme Court Umer Gilani contended before the single-member bench of the IHC saying CDA Special Magistrate failed to observe due process with the so-called ‘admission of guilt’ as his client was indicted even before charges were formally framed. The court was apprised that special magistrate asked Farmanullah if he had a cart in the Faisal Mosque, to which he replied that he did it to support his family.

In his statement before the CDA senior special magistrate, Farmanullah agreed to not make such a ‘mistake again’. He informed the court that he was a poor man. “I have to feed my family. There is no one to take care of them except me.”  The IHC order from Wednesday observed that the trial court was bound to frame charges under Section 243 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). If the accused pleads guilty in response, then a show cause notice was to be issued after which the court was liable to convict, it continued.

The court went on to observe that “…in the instant case, no charge has been framed, even in the impugned order there is no word regarding the framing of charge or pleading of guilty…”. It noted that the order was in violation of relevant provisions of the law and ‘patently illegal’ and issued the order to be set aside.

After brief hearing of the matter, the bench suspended CDA magistrate illegal order while granting bail to Farmanullah, who was currently being held at Adiala Jail, against a surety bond of Rs5,000.

It is pertinent to mention that following Farmanullah’s conviction, members of the Islamabad administration had claimed that he was involved in extorting protection money from other vendors outside the mosque. However, the challan did not have any statements from the said vendor.

CDA Chairman Noorul Amin Mengal had insinuated the same in a tweet while responding to an article on the issue. “There are mafias who manage rehris (push-carts), parking, Gerry’s appointments, bus terminals allocations, Sunday Bazars stalls, land rehabilitation, etc.,” he wrote in response to a BBC story on the issue.

English Daily Express Tribune reported saying citizens told the paper that said CDA officials were involved in getting protection money from such vendors and kiosk owners across the city. One person who worked with the department said it was “very likely that this guy failed to pay his monthly bribe to the CDA and was punished to give a clear message to other vendors”.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…