Categories Courts

IHC suspends CDA special magistrate illegal order as Kulfi vender gets bail

Islamabad High Court on Wednesday granted bail to a Kulfi vendor Farmanullah – sole breadwinner of his seven-member family who was sent behind the bars 15 days ago when an officer of the Capital Development Authority (CDA) exercised powers illegally and awarded him three months rigorous imprisonment and half a million rupee fine. The vendor has been accused for operating cart without required permission in front of Faisal Mosque.

Farmanullah, father of five, including four with special needs, his arrest sparked an outcry over the harsh and extreme nature of punishment meted out to a street vendor. Special Magistrate of the CDA awarded him sentenced under Section 46-A of the CDA Ordinance 1960 and Martial Law Regulation (MLR) No 63.

Appearing before single-member bench of Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri, counsel for the vendor Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani termed arrest and conviction of Farmanullah as sheer violation of constitutional fundamental rights of the accused person. He apprised the court that a Special Magistrate of the CDA who being an employee of the Authority has no formal authority as Judicial Magistrate adding, the official misused his power and awarded imprisonment without framing charge which is also violation of due process of law.

In July 11, officials of the CDA’s Enforcement Directorate arrested Farmanullah for operating his cart in the parking lot of the popular Faisal Mosque alleging he was running business cart without a permission.

TLTP has learnt that some people at the helm of CDA enforcement department have been repeatedly alleged to misuse their formal authority for vested interests but decision makers are avoiding rule of law implementation in true letter and spirit due to reasons best known to them. Spreading of Kitchi Abadis adjacent to Margalla Town, Humak, Rawal Town, Chak Shahzad are manifestation of CDA enforcement negligence which failed to take action against encroachers since a long. Existence of encroachments and illegal constructions in the vicinities worsening law and order  situation. 

Assailing the conviction order before Additional Sessions Judge, Advocate Gilani apprised the court that Farmanullah was convicted within 24 hours of his arrest, without being given the opportunity to seek legal representation. However, the Sessions Court didn’t suspend the sentence. To which the counsels invoked IHC jurisdiction for remedy in the matter.

Advocate Supreme Court Umer Gilani contended before the single-member bench of the IHC saying CDA Special Magistrate failed to observe due process with the so-called ‘admission of guilt’ as his client was indicted even before charges were formally framed. The court was apprised that special magistrate asked Farmanullah if he had a cart in the Faisal Mosque, to which he replied that he did it to support his family.

In his statement before the CDA senior special magistrate, Farmanullah agreed to not make such a ‘mistake again’. He informed the court that he was a poor man. “I have to feed my family. There is no one to take care of them except me.”  The IHC order from Wednesday observed that the trial court was bound to frame charges under Section 243 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). If the accused pleads guilty in response, then a show cause notice was to be issued after which the court was liable to convict, it continued.

The court went on to observe that “…in the instant case, no charge has been framed, even in the impugned order there is no word regarding the framing of charge or pleading of guilty…”. It noted that the order was in violation of relevant provisions of the law and ‘patently illegal’ and issued the order to be set aside.

After brief hearing of the matter, the bench suspended CDA magistrate illegal order while granting bail to Farmanullah, who was currently being held at Adiala Jail, against a surety bond of Rs5,000.

It is pertinent to mention that following Farmanullah’s conviction, members of the Islamabad administration had claimed that he was involved in extorting protection money from other vendors outside the mosque. However, the challan did not have any statements from the said vendor.

CDA Chairman Noorul Amin Mengal had insinuated the same in a tweet while responding to an article on the issue. “There are mafias who manage rehris (push-carts), parking, Gerry’s appointments, bus terminals allocations, Sunday Bazars stalls, land rehabilitation, etc.,” he wrote in response to a BBC story on the issue.

English Daily Express Tribune reported saying citizens told the paper that said CDA officials were involved in getting protection money from such vendors and kiosk owners across the city. One person who worked with the department said it was “very likely that this guy failed to pay his monthly bribe to the CDA and was punished to give a clear message to other vendors”.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

FCC Super Tax verdict, Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, Super Tax on high earners, Parliament taxing powers Pakistan, Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance, Super Tax legality Pakistan, Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, income tax law Pakistan, high income earners tax, oil and gas sector Super Tax, tax exemptions Pakistan, mudarabah Super Tax exemption, mutual funds tax exemption, unit trust funds Pakistan, retrospective taxation Pakistan, double taxation challenge, Supreme Court Super Tax case, High Courts Super Tax ruling, constitutional amendments Pakistan, 26th Constitutional Amendment, 27th Constitutional Amendment, revenue generation Pakistan, Rs310 billion revenue, Pakistan tax litigation, business community tax challenge, banks Super Tax Pakistan, corporate taxation Pakistan, federal budget Super Tax, economic stabilisation measures Pakistan, Operation Zarb-e-Azb levy, internally displaced persons fund, tax policy Pakistan, constitutional bench Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

FCC Validates Parliament’s Legislative Competence To Levy Super Tax

ISLAMABAD: While dismissing all pleas challenging legality of the Super Tax on high-income earners, the…

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…