Categories Courts

IHC to hear JI Karachi plea over LG polls result rigging

The Islamabad High Court will take up a plea on Monday (tomorrow) against alleged electoral malpractice in recounting result of Local Government (LG) polls relating to Jama’at-e-Islami (JI) candidate for Chairman Union Council 8, Safari Park, TMC Safoora Karachi.
Advocate Umer Ijaz Gilani, counsel for Rashid Mannan Azmi, has filed petition before the IHC saying his client is aggrieved party who claimed his victory was turned into defeat because of a rigged recount.
A single-member bench of the IHC comprising Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb will hear the petition of the JI candidate for chairman in the UC-8 Rashid Mannan Azmi.
Earlier, the petitioner has approached the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). However, when the ECP passed a non-speaking order in response to his application, he was left with no recourse but to resort to the High Court.
The petitioner had secured 2153 votes which was 27 more than the runner up candidate belonging to the Pakistan Tehreek e Insaaf. Thereafter, however, a rigged recount was carried out in which the JI candidate lost 72 votes while the PTI candidate lost none. Instead the PTI candidate actually gained votes.
When the JI candidate inquired from the RO about why he had lost so many votes, he was told that his votes had not been stamped by the Presiding Officers. The petitioner contends that this obviously show that either his votes were tampered with after completion of polling. Therefore, the results of the mala fide recount should be discarded and his party’s original victory restored.
Petitioner had approached the Election Commission but the ECP passed a mechanical order which does not even mention the facts of this case. The petitioner claims that Article 218 (3) of the Constitution has been violated as under the said Article the Commission is under an obligation to “completely and fully” discharge its mandate and that in this instance the Commission did not pay heed to their constitutional responsibility. An interesting argument made by the petitioner relies on the apprehension that the outcome and nature of the recount in the first place may set a precedent for any losing candidates in the future to easily set aside the natural, systemic and legal procedure and outcome of polls in any constituency whatsoever through post-poll rigging. The petition is scheduled to be heard by the Honorable Islamabad High Court on Monday, 27th March, 2023.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…