Categories Courts

Petitioner Moves IHC to Ban Imran Khan’s Social Media Posts, Terming Them Illegal

ISLAMABAD – While invoking jurisdiction of the Islamabad High Court – a petitioner sought directives for action against continued dissemination of tweets from the official social media account of former Prime Minister and PTI Chairman, Imran Khan Niazi, who is currently imprisoned at Adiala Jail after conviction.

Barrister Zafarullah Khan has filed the plea on behalf of advocate Ghulam Murtaza Khan, who alleges that the tweets are illegal, unlawful, mischievous, malicious, and criminal, raising critical questions about prison security and the rule of law.

The petitioner has made heads of the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), the Superintendent of Central Jail Adiala, Imran Khan himself, and the current PTI Chairman, Gohar Ali Khan as respondents in the matter.

The petitioner lays out three plausible scenarios for the origin of the tweets: either Imran Khan is being unlawfully facilitated within the jail, his visitors are receiving instructions from him and posting the content, or his account is being operated by third parties outside the prison to “mislead the public and spread anti-State illegal propaganda.”

Citing the Prison Rules 1978, which prohibit prisoners from using mobile phones, internet, and social media, the petitioner contends that the continued posting of tweets from the @ImranKhanPTI handle is a clear violation. The content, it is submitted, is “derogatory, defamatory, and inciteful,” targeting public functionaries, constitutional office-holders, and the armed forces, thereby attempting to “malign State institutions and spread hatred amongst the public.”

The petitioner alleges while describing constitutional and statutory violations allegedly committed through these tweets. He claims the content breaches fundamental constitutional articles, including those pertaining to loyalty to the state (Article 5) and equality before the law (Articles 4 and 25). Furthermore, the petitioner asserts that the tweets constitute statutory offenses under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), such as promoting enmity (Section 153-A) and public mischief (Section 505). It also invokes the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), alleging the content falls under offenses like cyber terrorism (Section 10) and hate speech (Section 11).Highlighting statutory duty of the PTA under the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act, 1996, the petitioner urged the court to direct the Authority to block such content, stating that its ongoing dissemination is “prejudicial to the country’s security and integrity.”

The petitioner also urged the court to issue directives to the NCCIA and the PTA to investigate and identify those responsible for operating the social media account while asking the PTA to immediately block and remove the controversial content. He also sought directives for the Superintendent of Adiala Jail to ensure strict adherence to prison regulations besides directing Imran Khan to cease all alleged illegal activities. He also prayed to the court to direct Gohar Ali Khan and any other “aiders and abettors” to stop re-circulating the contentious tweets.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…