Categories Courts

NJPMC: CJP Directs AG to Address Detainee Production Non-Compliance; Endorses E-Filing and Commercial Litigation Reforms

ISLAMABAD: Chairing the 56th meeting of the National Judicial Policy-Making Committee (NJPMC), Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Yahya Afridi asked Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to address instances of non-compliance with the legal requirement of producing detainees before a magistrate within the mandatory 24-hour period.

Referring to the institutional response to emotive cases relating to enforced disappearances, the Chief Justice appreciated the government’s initiative to address the issue. At the previous NJPMC meeting held on October 17, the Attorney General had informed the forum that the matter had almost been resolved through an amendment to Section 11EEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, which requires the production of a detained person before a magistrate within 24 hours. He also assured that a comprehensive mechanism to redress complaints of non-compliance was being considered by the government and would be presented to the committee.

On Saturday, the NJPMC deliberated on key policy issues while reviewing the implementation status of decisions taken in its 55th meeting. The committee unanimously reiterated its resolve to strengthen institutional capacity, accelerate access to justice, and ensure efficient and effective justice delivery. The meeting, convened at the Supreme Court building, was attended by the chief justices of all high courts, with the Federal Constitutional Court chief justice present on special invitation.

Commercial Litigation Corridor Reforms

The NJPMC reviewed the recommendations of the Sub-Committee constituted to address protracted litigation and injunctive orders in commercial, revenue, and fiscal cases. The Sub-Committee’s report highlighted key reforms, including the establishment of dedicated benches, curtailment of frivolous litigation, constitution of a screening committee at the FBR level, avoidance of coercive revenue targets for state-owned enterprises, and improvements in tribunal structures. The report was shared with all high courts for input, and the recommendations were unanimously endorsed.

The NJPMC appreciated the endorsement by the high courts and decided to implement the recommendations, directing the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP) to share them with the FBR for implementation. The LJCP was also tasked with establishing a mechanism for taxation and revenue case management at each high court on the model of the Supreme Court.

Case Disposal and Model Courts

The committee lauded the disposal of 558,474 cases out of 1,253,425 of specified categories within the notified timeframe during the preceding quarter, calling it reflective of the high courts’ strong commitment. The Lahore High Court was commended for deciding a record 465,455 cases, while the Peshawar High Court was recognised for prioritising inheritance cases and operating a double docket regime.

The NJPMC asked high courts to dispose of the oldest succession cases up to 2019 within 30 days and appreciated the establishment and performance of model trial courts for chronic civil and criminal cases. A special committee was tasked to finalise recommendations on district judiciary reforms within 30 days, with the LHC chief justice directed to convene the reform committee accordingly.

Complaint Redressal and Jail Reforms

The NJPMC lauded high courts for operationalising accessible public forums at high court and district court levels for complaint redressal. Reports of jail reform subcommittees and consolidated action plans had been shared with provincial justice committee chairpersons. Chief justices were instructed to engage with provincial chief secretaries and the Interior Division for legislative, policy, and administrative inputs, with progress to be reviewed in the next meeting.

Digital Transformation and E-Filing

Regarding national guidelines for AI in judicial institutions, the NJPMC decided that the LJCP would circulate the draft guidelines to high courts for feedback within 30 days, after which the final version will be placed before the committee for approval.

The committee also approved immediate initiation of e-filing in all district courts as the first phase of the national e-courts project. High courts were directed to review existing rules, including Schedule I of the CPC, or invoke rule-making powers to enable electronic case filing. The concept of one-window, integrated family and women facilitation centres within judicial complexes was approved in principle, subject to government funding.

Access to Justice Development Fund

High courts were commended for executing projects under the Access to Justice Development Fund, with a stress on optimum utilisation and timely completion. The Lahore and Peshawar high courts were asked to liaise with provincial governments for balance funding to ensure solarisation of courts, with all high courts directed to utilise released funds efficiently.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla,ederal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, import ban from India, India Pakistan trade ban, SROs 927 and 928 2019, commerce ministry appeal, ban on Indian imports, books import ban, judicial overreach, separation of powers, foreign policy Pakistan, national security trade restrictions, statutory regulatory orders Pakistan, constitutional jurisdiction, executive domain, judicial review limits, Pakistan India trade relations, Kashmir policy Pakistan, Supreme Court Pakistan appeal transfer, 27th Constitutional Amendment, Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Advocate Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, Additional Attorney General Aamir Rehman, non-justiciable matters, import export regulation Pakistan, federal government policy decisions

FCC Reserves Verdict on Govt Appeal Challenging LHC Directives on India Import Ban

ISLAMABAD: Upon hearing extensive arguments from Advocate Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, the Federal Constitutional Court…

Law Today,Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court Pakistan, Ms Sabiha Hameed promotion, promotion discrimination, natural justice, Audi Alteram Partem, CSS officer promotion, Central Selection Board, Federal Service Tribunal, civil service law, right to be heard, procedural fairness, fair hearing, CSB reconsideration, judicial directions, promotion eligibility, career rights civil servants, due process Pakistan, government promotion rules, FST ruling

SC Directs Establishment Division for Fresh CSB Hearing in Promotion Case of Retired CSS Officer

ISLAMABAD: While hearing the plea of retired CSS officer Ms Sabiha Hameed regarding promotion discrimination,…

Lahore High Court judgment, LHC ruling Pakistan, Justice Ali Zia Bajwa, proclaimed offender vs absconder, absconder legal definition, proclaimed offender CrPC, Code of Criminal Procedure Pakistan, criminal law Pakistan, due process of law, fundamental rights Pakistan, arbitrary state action, judicial safeguards, declaration of proclaimed offender, criminal proclamation procedure, abscondence not proof of guilt, benefit of doubt principle, death sentence appeal Pakistan, acquittal by High Court, Asad Abbas case, wrongful conviction Pakistan, medical evidence vs eyewitnesses, prosecution failure, fair trial rights, Article 10A Constitution, liberty and due process, judicial control over police powers, criminal justice system Pakistan

LHC Defines ‘Absconder’ vs. ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Boundary; Sets Aside Death Sentence Over Procedural Lapses

LAHORE: In a significant judicial determination that reinforces the protection of fundamental rights against arbitrary…