Categories Courts

IP Tribunal grants stay order against pharma firm

Intellectual Property Tribunal KPK/ Islamabad Thursday issued a stay order against KBR Pharmaceuticals Haripur and restrained the company from infringing the trademark rights of Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd Karachi product ‘Risek’.

Invoking jurisdiction of Intellectual Property Tribunal, Islamabad, on Thursday, one of the largest branded generic pharmaceutical companies in Pakistan sought stay order and compensatory damages of Rs100 million against defendant company over copyrights and trademark violation of its product Risek tablet that cure certain stomach problems including gastric ulcer and indigestion.

Advocate High Court Umer Ijaz Gilani filed the lawsuit on behalf of Getz Pharma (Pvt) Ltd Karachi making the Chief Executive Officer of the KBR Pharmaceuticals Haripur as defendant in the matter.

Appearing before Presiding Officer of the IP Tribunal Islamabad, Gilani informed the tribunal that plaintiff is a research-based generic pharmaceutical company in Pakistan which is dealing with local and international operations. He further argued that the plaintiff company is the only entity in Pakistan whose manufacturing facility is pre-qualified and approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Pharmaceutical Inspection Cooperation Scheme (PIC/S) member country. The plaintiff company is also the largest contributor to the Central Research Fund, WPPF, WWF and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as every product of the company is being exported and sold in 22 countries including Pakistan. Gilani submitted the company is also making significant contributions to the national exchequer.

The plaintiff claimed that the company enjoys absolute and exclusive rights over the trademark RISEK and copyright over the distinctive artistic work, label design and colour scheme in which this product is packaged. The Plaintiff has a valid and binding Trademark License Agreement dated 14.08.2015 with Getz Pharma International.

Advocate Umer Gilani

Advocate Umer Gilani said that the defendant is a pharmaceutical business by the name of ‘KBR Pharmaceuticals’ adding as per the plaintiff’s knowledge, the KBR is not incorporated under the laws of Pakistan (as per the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan).

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant company is involved in using the unique trademark, packet design, artistic work, and colour scheme of the plaintiff’s product ‘RISEK’ to manufacture, market and sell its similar product ‘RENZK’, in 20mg and 40mg strengths.

Seeking a stay order against the defendant company, the plaintiff urged the IP Tribunal to issue restraining orders against the defendant, its partners, employees, agents, representatives and/or distributors permanently from directly or indirectly copying or imitating the plaintiff’s product namely RISEK. The plaintiff company also urged the Tribunal to issue a restraining order against the defendant from infringing upon the plaintiff’s exclusive IPRs in relation to RISEK while manufacturing, packaging, marketing and/or selling its product namely RENZK and for any other purpose and in any manner whatsoever.

The IP Tribunal has also been urged to issue directives to surrender and destroy all packaging, marketing and other materials which include a copy or imitation of the plaintiff’s product namely RISEK.

The plaintiff said in the prayer, “Award compensatory damages to the plaintiff amounting to Rs. 100,000,000/- (One hundred million rupees) to be paid by the defendant for causing loss of sales, profits, goodwill and reputation due to copying and imitation of the plaintiff’s product namely RISEK or at least nominal/punitive damages amounting to a minimum of Rs. 50,000,000/- (Fifty million rupees).

Later, granting a stay order in the matter, the tribunal issued notice to defendants for May 12,2022.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…