Categories Courts

JCP Set to Reshuffle High Court Judges Under 27th Amendment

ISLAMABAD: Significant shifts are looming for the provincial High Courts as the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) prepares to transfer High Court judges to fulfill structural mandates of the 27th Constitutional Amendment.

Reports indicate the Commission will soon convene a formal session to finalize these relocations. This reshuffle, expected within the coming weeks, marks a critical step in operationalizing the nation’s updated legal framework.

The move will come in light of the 27th Amendment that significantly altered the constitutional scheme governing the transfer of judges of the superior judiciary by empowering the JCP to recommend transfers of judges from one court to another without requiring their consent.

According to sources, the issue of judges’ transfers was discussed informally during a recent interaction among the Chief Justices of the high courts. The Chief Justices had assembled earlier this month to attend the 56th meeting of the National Judicial Policy-Making Committee (NJPMC).

Following the meeting, the NJPMC issued a statement highlighting key policy directions, including measures to reduce case backlog, improve the disposal of commercial litigation, and streamline mechanisms relating to tax cases. The statement, however, did not mention any deliberation on the transfer of judges, as the subject was not included in the formal agenda of the committee.

Sources disclosed although the NJPMC did not formally deliberate on the matter, the issue of transfers was discussed informally among the Chief Justices on the sidelines of the meeting. The official added that the discussions were exploratory in nature and did not amount to any decision.

Sources further said that the JCP was expected to convene a series of meetings over the next month. Besides considering the confirmation of additional judges of the IHC, the LHC and the Balochistan High Court, the Commission is likely to take up the issue of transfers as well.

Before the 27th Amendment, Article 200 required the consent of the judge proposed to be transferred, in addition to mandatory consultations among the President, the Chief Justice of Pakistan, and the Chief Justices of the High Courts concerned. The revised constitutional provision replaced this mechanism with a process centred on the JCP.

Under the substituted Article 200, the President of Pakistan may transfer a judge of a high court from one court to another on the recommendation of the JCP. The amendment also addresses the question of seniority, providing that the seniority of a transferred judge shall be reckoned from the date of his initial appointment as a high court judge. However, it expressly bars the transfer of a judge to a high court where, upon transfer, they would become senior to the Chief Justice of that court. In such an eventuality, the transferred judge will be entitled to get an additional allowance.

The Amendment also made it clear that a judge who would not accept their transfer,  would accordingly be charged under Article 209 and be tried by the SJC.

Following the passage of the Amendment, reports circulated regarding the likely transfer of a number of judges. According to these reports, around 10 judges of the Lahore High Court (LHC) and four judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) may be assigned to different courts or benches for periods ranging from six months to two years.

The proposed postings include benches of the Balochistan High Court, particularly the Zhob bench, as well as the Sindh High Court’s benches at Larkana, Sukkur and Mirpurkhas. No official confirmation had been issued regarding these reports.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Supreme Court of Pakistan, FIR rights, Faryaadi term, Bakhidmat Janaab SHO, police terminology Pakistan, police reforms Sindh, Section 154 CrPC, citizens legal rights, criminal justice system Pakistan, colonial police legacy, police accountability, delayed FIR registration, Section 201 PPC, police officers duty, police public service, Itlaah Deendhar, Shikayat Kandhar, Itlaah Dahinda, Sindh police reforms, constitutional guarantees Pakistan, rights-based policing, criminal petition verdict, Sindh High Court, murder case appeal, Pakistan police procedure, criminal law Pakistan, top court landmark verdict, citizen protection law, law today Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim

SC Banishes ‘Faryaadi’ Culture and ‘Bakhidmat Janaab SHO’ Salutations to End Colonial Policing Legacies

ISLAMABAD: Announcing its 19-page landmark verdict , the Supreme Court made it clear that citizens…

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Zeeshan Masih jail appeal, life sentence murder case, single FIR multiple trials, double trial same incident, procedural illegality criminal trial, criminal administration of justice Pakistan, FIR legality Pakistan, Additional Sessions Judge Islamabad, deputation judges Lahore High Court, LHC deputation controversy, judicial competence Pakistan, murder trial procedural lapse, jail appeal Islamabad High Court, Prosecutor General Islamabad summoned, due process of law Pakistan, criminal justice system Pakistan, High Court supervisory jurisdiction, subordinate courts oversight, witness testimony recording, judicial training Pakistan, prosecutors training Pakistan, double jeopardy Pakistan, Section 403 CrPC, criminal procedure Pakistan, Islamabad courts news, Pakistan judiciary accountability, Law Today Pakistan news

IHC Questions ‘Grave Procedural Lapse’ as Single FIR Leads to Multiple Trials

ISLAMABAD:  While hearing a jail appeal of Zeeshan Masih – who is currently serving life…

FCC Super Tax verdict, Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, Super Tax on high earners, Parliament taxing powers Pakistan, Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance, Super Tax legality Pakistan, Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, income tax law Pakistan, high income earners tax, oil and gas sector Super Tax, tax exemptions Pakistan, mudarabah Super Tax exemption, mutual funds tax exemption, unit trust funds Pakistan, retrospective taxation Pakistan, double taxation challenge, Supreme Court Super Tax case, High Courts Super Tax ruling, constitutional amendments Pakistan, 26th Constitutional Amendment, 27th Constitutional Amendment, revenue generation Pakistan, Rs310 billion revenue, Pakistan tax litigation, business community tax challenge, banks Super Tax Pakistan, corporate taxation Pakistan, federal budget Super Tax, economic stabilisation measures Pakistan, Operation Zarb-e-Azb levy, internally displaced persons fund, tax policy Pakistan, constitutional bench Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

FCC Validates Parliament’s Legislative Competence To Levy Super Tax

ISLAMABAD: While dismissing all pleas challenging legality of the Super Tax on high-income earners, the…