Categories Courts

Nepra withdraws proposed amendment in Net-Metering Rules 2015

While hearing a public interest petition, National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has decided to withdraw proposed amendments in net-metering rules 2015. The decision will cushion electricity rates for rooftop solar consumers.

Appearing before the Authority on behalf of a number of Net-Metering consumers Barrister Umer Ijaz Gilani contended saying proposed amendment would have changed per unit price at which utility companies buy excess power produced by rooftop solar power producers.

Barrister Gilani and Moin Fudda argued that the financial deal between the state authorities and the entire 20,000 strong rooftop solar power community in Pakistan cannot be reworked simply through a one-word delegated legislation.

Gilani further said that the top court has repeatedly held that the executive authority cannot exercise its rule-making power (whether such power is to make, amend, vary or rescind) to take away vested rights of the citizens, and any change which is destructive to rights so vested is without lawful authority and of no legal effect (PLD 1970 SC 439). Counsel also argued that since rooftop solar generators are selling less than 20MW to the national grid, which is less than one percent of the country’s power basket, it made no policy sense to target them.

“In the light of Supreme Court verdicts, an executive authority cannot exercise its rule-making power to take away vested rights of the citizens, ” Barrister Umer Gilani

The public/ consumers, during the hearing, strongly opposed the proposed amendments citing reasons that electricity through net metering is one of the most efficient methods incurring low distribution losses, with no investment for distribution infrastructure, and the proposed amendment in the Regulations would discourage net metering / solar installation.

Barrister Gilani was of the view that the proposed amendment would have changed the per unit price at which utility companies buy excess power produced by rooftop solar power producers. Presently, these excess units are purchased according to the ‘average power purchase price’. If the amendments had gone through, they would be purchased at the ‘average energy purchase price’, which would be much lower – Rs9 as opposed to Rs19 per unit. This means that the rate being offered to rooftop solar producers would have been halved in one go.

Consequently, the Nepra allowed the public interest petition as the Authority said in its 2-page decision (copy available with TLTP). All the four members of the Nepra including its Chairman Tauseef H. Farooqui jointly announced the decision, saying “The Authority has decided not to amend the existing NEPRA (Alternative & Renewable Energy) Distributed Generation and Net Metering Regulation, 2015”.

It is pertinent to mention that during 2022, the Nepra had decided to amend the existing Nepra (Alternative and Renewable Energy) Distributed Generation and Net-Metering Regulations, 2015.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…